this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
815 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

6506 readers
262 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text: a post from @lolennui.bsky.social that says: Once my German friend asked what creative people do without arts grants and other support in the US and I felt like a parent trying to explain to their kid that the puppies can die sometimes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 189 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If you have some free time and aren't easily depressed, go ahead and look up the backgrounds of your favorite, recently ascendant artists. Many, if not most of them come from privileged backgrounds, have wealthy spouses, trust funds, or familial industry connections.

And while I personally don't think that such advantages necessarily diminish the importance of their art, just think of how much more potentially moving and profound work we'll never see just because the people who should be making it never got chance to develop, since they've been too busy just trying to keep a roof over their heads.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've thought this for a long time about other things. it's truly a shame.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We could have cured cancer years ago but the scientist grew up poor and ended up working the graveyard shifts in the mines.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.

~ Stephen Jay Gould

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Ramanujan died at 32 from complications with childhood dysentery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Have you seen S4 of The Boys?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

More than that, you'd get better diversity in motifs and techniques if you expand the population base to a representation of society.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If you want to see art though you can just ask a computer to make it for you

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Boooo, that will never compare to the personal satisfaction of honing a craft.

Edit: machine generation can be fun but I promise it's not as fulfilling as finding something you love doing purely for the sake of it and watching your progress over years.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah honing the craft of which key words to use

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Tbh I've had plenty of fun with that too

Edit: downvoted why? Think I'm hypocritical? Or should it be nsfw?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And where did that computer get the artwork it pieced together?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone is going to say the same way a flesh artist does. But I think it's more than synthesis of what a person sees, its their lived experience

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Well if they said that they would be objectively wrong. An AI puts no thought into it's creation, despite the misleading name. It simply is able to approximate an imitation of the artwork it's trained on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Well also because of this we only see a very small representative sample with the art that does end up making it out into the open.