this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
629 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7526 readers
3149 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

me too, but that's not an option.

so, are you going to vote for more genocide, or less genocide?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Let's put this in perspective. bibi and Isreal is committing Genocide. Genocide has happened and is still happening. Americans have provided weapons of war and continue to provide weapons of war to Isreal as they have all their allies. The only thing America has failed to do is pressure bibi to stop. Do they have that power? I wouldn't know. Some people claim to know.

In 2024 we aren't voting for genocide. We are voting for candidates all claiming to know the exact right thing to do on this particular issue. Will any of this result in turning back the clock on what's been done? No. Should the united states president be able to midgate the continued conflict? Possibly.

I'm going to remind everyone again. America is not the world police. You don't want them as the world police. You can continue your campaign against the democrats all you want but please. I beg you. Look at who your allies are in that fight. bibi himself would cum his pants to see the orange dictator take office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

because our two party and single choice voting systems suck. But it's the world we live in and we have to do the best we can with it.

so if your only two options are more genocide or less genocide, which are you going to choose? And if your answer is "none of the above" remember that effectively counts as a half vote for more genocide.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Which side is less genocide?

Remember, The number of dead, The number of refugees, And the number of destroyed buildings, all outnumber what occured in 1948. By several times.

This is the worst ethnic cleansing the region has seen in centuries. Even Saddam racked up less kills when he was gassing Kurds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There were more than 5 hundred thousand people killed in the Iran-Iraq war

You might have forgotten because that's already 0,4 centuries ago

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

War is not the extermination of an ethnic group. Deaths on a battlefield are not dead children buried under rubble.

You are comparing the battle of the bulge with a death camp.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you think there were no children killed in the Iran-Iraq war?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

You think a death on the battlefield is equivalent to bombing a hospital?