this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
414 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46045 readers
3652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Was China bigger or smaller after taking over Tibet? I think you know the answer is bigger.

Making your country bigger would be doing what with it? I think you know the answer is expanding it.

And I doubt I'm making you laugh or you wouldn't be making personal attacks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're just showing you don't understand basic concepts. You called China's liberation of Tibet "colonialism", proving you don't know the meaning of it. Expansionism isn't "when borders grow at any time in history", it's a tendency of a nation to view its territorial expansion as a desirable goal for the sake of it or for access to resource for example. Austria building an embassy in Tibet would grow Austria's borders, technically counting as expansionism according to you. You have lib level of politics knowledge and analysis, and it's hysterical how you try to bend definitions to make things look good for US imperialism

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So Tibet wasn't a desirable goal and didn't give China access to resources? They just did it out of pure altruism?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it was "expansionism" that China sought, why stop at Tibet?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The U.S. stopped expanding its borders with various Pacific islands in the 1940s. I assume you still consider them expansionist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, the US isn't expansionist, it's imperialist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Oh, ok, well then China is also imperialist. I guess we're done.