this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
320 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45654 readers
2762 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Explicitly combatants... and anyone who happens to be in their vicinity when the bomb goes off.

"Extremely" targeted you say? So when they were detonated, the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians

Or even had the pager at all instead of leaving it at home where their kids could get hold of it or a fire could be started.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The bombs are small. People in the vicinity are not harmed. You can see videos of them exploding in supermarkets and on streets. The only one injured is the owner of the pager.

Compare to the 11 Druze children in Israel Hezbollah killed recently.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah. So this 9-year-old-girl was killed on purpose then, I take it?

Since "People in the vicinity are not harmed" it had to have been targeted. Right? Right??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So which is it? "People in the vicinity are not harmed" or "whops we killed a kid"?

Can't fucking be both, can it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sure it can. Only people directly in contact with the pager were harmed. If a child holds it, then it is harmed.

The explosion only had a small area of lethal effect is what I’m saying. There are lots of videos of people close by the explosion being unaffected.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, it can't be both.

You say that "people in the vicinity are not harmed." Either the 9-year-old-girl was targeted, or she wasn't. If she was harmed, it was according to you, a targeted strike at her, or she would not have been harmed.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Either she was harmed on accident by a bomb which did end up harming innocents, or she was targeted on purpose. THOSE ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE STATEMENTS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You’re on a soccer field and try to kick the ball into the goal, miss and hit a spectator. The goal was targeted, the spectator wasn’t.

The target was a Hezbollah member, the weapon was a pager bomb, the child is an innocent bystander hit by accident.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

These attempts at defending indiscriminate attacks on civilian population are fucking disgusting. I genuinely don't know how you sleep at night when you're defending the death of a 9-year-old girl.

More like "you want to kill a soccer player who did something very bad to you. You get a soccer ball and plant it full of explosives. You leave it on a football pitch. Not even necessarily the one the player you're trying to kill uses. Just a pitch. Any pitch. Then you hope that the first person to touch the ball and explode is the person you intended. You end up killing several innocents and injuring hundreds."

Despite all your shitty propaganda, THE STATEMENTS ARE STILL MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. They can't be "extremely surgical attacks" which accidentally kill innocent children.

That's like saying you're a vegan who eats meat. Doesn't fucking work.

So was Israel's attack "extremely targeted" and they 'chose* to kill a 9-year-old-girl OR were these terror attacks so uncontrolled and chaotic that a child died on accident?

It's EITHER OR.