this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
320 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45629 readers
2542 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 156 points 6 months ago (8 children)

an 8-year-old girl and an 11-year-old boy are among the dead.

Great way to radicalize the next generation.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world 134 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Okigotitnow@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I bet this terrorist group will be using pigeons from now on.

[–] oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org 21 points 6 months ago (5 children)

These are extremely targeted attacks, not aimed at the wider population. It is meant to more than scare Hezbollah members for sure.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 78 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The stuff is blowing up inside stores and buildings around innocent people. How is that targeted? Israel doesn't give 2 shits about innocent people being injured and possibly killed.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's still a million times better than dropping a thousand pound bomb on a refugee camp to take out 1 hamas guy, and that's at least commendable.

It's worse that they're blowing up people in a country they're not openly at war with, stirring shit and risking even more retaliation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

How is this not super targeted? Hitting 3000 terrorists and and only a handful of civilians as collateral is exceptionally good. For you it’s probably bad anytime Israel kills one of their enemies.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

So like killing a "handful" of Israeli civilians would be "exceptionally good" if the target was a bunch of IDF reservists?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Traditionally, a targeted attack minimizes collateral damage to almost zero. Do you have stats on who was killed/injured? I do know 2 children were killed. I'm sure they were hard-core Hezbollah.

Doing this kind of attack indicates Israel didn't care AT ALL who they took out. Ah, much like their reactions in Gaza.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] filister@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (20 children)

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule80 you know International laws exist for a reason, and Israel clearly violated many international laws, which by the way were created to prevent such events like WWII.

You know Israel can find a peaceful solution if it only permits the establishment of an independent state of Palestine. But instead they prefer to continue their warmongering politics.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 58 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So would you say it's using violence to instill terror and achieve political goals?

[–] oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

Since this targets explicitly combatants, it’s not terrorism.

Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims

The attacks are extremely targeted, and thus not random at all. No terrorism.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Explicitly combatants... and anyone who happens to be in their vicinity when the bomb goes off.

"Extremely" targeted you say? So when they were detonated, the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians?

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians

Or even had the pager at all instead of leaving it at home where their kids could get hold of it or a fire could be started.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (18 children)

Since this targets explicitly combatants

Hezbollah is, also, a political party. It's military wing was formed to fight the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It is classified as a terrorist organisation by the majority of the international community. By legal definition, all Hezbollah members are terrorists regardless of what they do in the organisation, in the same way that all SS members are war criminals even if they were an office janitor or something, which makes them legitimate targets in a broader way than ordinary combatants who are bound and covered by the laws of war.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

I don't know if you grew up during the color coded terror threat level days, but after updating everyone on the days terrorism threat color, the nightly news anchors would share how many terrorists were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Even as a kid, I thought to myself, "how is everyone killed by coalition forces a terrorist?"

Or, "why are car bombs that kill coalition forces in theatre, called terror attacks?"

News flash, governments and media label all sorts of organizations and actions terrorism, 90% of it is propaganda, or bullshit.

Otherwise, I guess that would mean Ukrainian forces fighting Russians are also terrorists, which is how the Russian government and media refers to them.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

in the same way that all SS members are war criminals

That's absolutely not how the nazis' war crimes were handled post-war.
Only those with a direct active role and sufficient knowledge were charged in the post-war trials.
90+% of the SS members just went right back into their pre-war jobs.
(At least in the western part, the Soviets were much more...thorough in their de-nazification.)

Also, a janitor in a civilian building will never be an active combatant by any stretch of international law, no matter which organisation they belong to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

From what I can tell online its militant wing predates the political wing. Just adding that in because I thought it might be the other way around based on your comment

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Customary international humanitarian law prohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction. Human Rights Watch

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The pagers were very questionable. Even assuming ONLY hezbollah had the explosive pagers, they were still detonating in public since the point of a pager is to be able to carry it around.

Walkie talkie wise? I still need to reflexively condemn anything that kills children. But... that actually does seem super targeted and would presumably not be something a terrorist "should" carry around in public during their non-terrorist lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 78 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Terrorists being terrorized until more terrorists can terrorize the terrorizers.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Bibi and co need the endless cycle of hate and violence to go on so he can rob his own with impunity.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 24 points 6 months ago

It is the biggest "problem" of modern warfare. We don't fight wars of conquest anymore because that tends to actually make other countries care (because those brown people have resources!). So we attack and then leave.

It is similar to why France and England (or China/Japan/Korea) were basically at continuous levels of war for hundreds (?) of years. Because when you roll up and kill a bunch of people and maybe steal a goat? The remaining people want revenge. When you conquer them and either ethnically cleanse them to nonexistence or integrate them into your society? They forget why they were angry after a generation or two.

I very much do NOT believe the world would be a better place with more ethnic cleansing and stealing of land. But we also are in a mess where retaliation between countries just continues with no real consequences to the people who are calling for the attacks. And the civilians just get rightfully angry when their kid is permanently blinded because she was looking the wrong way at the Lebanese equivalent of a Kroger.

And then you get the keyboard warriors who hop in decades (or even centuries) into the conflict, pick a side, and immediately say THESE terrorists are good guys and THOSE terrorists are bad guys.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You know whats even scarier? Out of the thousands of devices produced I bet none of them have gone through proper quality control and testing (because it requires documentation, which kind of goes against the whole "covert" thing), which means the failure rates are probably through the roof. This means that there are most likely dozens of unexploded devices still around filled with plastique. This means 2 things, 1st you essentially gave away military grade explosives to uncontrolled civilians which can be harnessed and reused for other malicious purposes, and 2nd if a media illiterate civilian doesn't know to chuck their device in a tar pit, they will continue to walk around with an unexploded bomb strapped to their leg for a long time.

All in all, whoever came up with this Idea, should be gunned down in the streets like a dog. Or at least be prosecuted for every confirmed civilian death.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The Israelis are the world's largest terrorists and the world's largest cause of terrorism. I have had many 'debates' with zionists before getting permabanned off reddit who actually tried to frame Israel as a stabilizing force in the region where all the whining infantile Arabs can blame all their problems on (which they don't and never did BTW) instead of tearing each other apart for land and on religious grounds (also bullshit).

I simply pointed out how absurd their beliefs are and how utterly baseless. As you would expect, they constantly shifted the goal posts in ways that revealed the sheer depth of ignorance that they had about anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

All in all, whoever came up with this Idea, should be gunned down in the streets like a dog. Or at least be prosecuted for every confirmed civilian death.

Biden would personally strap a medal around their neck. As would Trump… and Harris

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, it's a pretty brilliant idea. It did what it was intended to do.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

KABC - Los Angeles News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for KABC - Los Angeles News:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://abc7.com/post/explosions-witnessed-beirut-funeral-hezbollah-members-child-killed-pager-attack/15320074/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments