this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
625 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

17844 readers
60 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also good for composting and making room in your recycling bin

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Selling the actual print is more work than selling the STL.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Oh definitely, I just think it's easier to justify paying for a physical product than it is paying for a single file if you still need to manufacture it yourself. Still a valid business practice, I'm just biased toward "information should be free" and all that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, buying things like clothes patterns and carpentry plans is definitely a thing. An stl is really no different.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

That's a fair point, I guess I think of digital goods in a different context.

They definitely deserve compensation for their work, and how they chose to do it is absolutely valid. I think I'm biased toward open source hardware where the labor of creating their digital files is subsidized by selling the physical product instead. I realize that's a risk and takes more effort though, so I totally understand why they didn't do that.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)