Funny

8803 readers

1777 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

382

Would you take the discount? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

is that not how elder should be defined?

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The average life expectancy for Americans is 79. In the US at least we define "senior citizen" as over 60 (legally and for healthcare), that seems like a reasonable age for elder to start.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you seriously think that the majority of people should become elders?

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

Americans over the age of 65 represent less than 20% of the population. The group of people 60 to 64 is 6.5% of the population. That's not even a quarter of the population.

As to your question, yes. Even if it was 90% of the population that was 60+. being an elder, senior citizen, a member of the grandparent generation, olds, or whatever you'd like to call them has more to do with the individual's age than how many of them there are.