this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
386 points (96.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31006 readers
3551 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If the source of the article is suspect, where is the research by tech firms with a vested interest in cloud and communication platforms publishing counter studies?

Also, with both studies cited, the best argument is that workers are happy to work more than 8 hours a day. Does that mean you should expect workers to be on call for longer than an 8 hour day because they are working remote?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Science. Is not about winning. Fuckface.

You and people like you are literally inhibiting the progress of the human race for personal gain. Congratulations.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So there is no scientific evidence that remote work leads to more productivity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ignores salient points made, what-about-isms to reassert bad point, doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

At least you are consistent.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

Ignores salient points made

I've responded to them, not ignored them.

what-about-isms to reassert bad point

I've said that, if you want to argue the studies presented, present other studies. The only one presented I had comments on and quoted the text.

doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

Science is about presenting data in a way that can be reviewed and verified. I've asked for studies that back up the assertions made while providing references to my assertions. Where is the data to back up the claim that remote work is more productive?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the source of the article is suspect, where is the research by tech firms with a vested interest in cloud and communication platforms publishing counter studies?

I think they're right here

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pick one. Otherwise you aren't better than alt-right people on Facebook that say to "do your own research".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, but you're no better than alt-right people on Facebook ignoring the research that's literally one click away because you're afraid it will disagree with you

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've provided sources from reputable sources of journalism, you haven't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

FYI, none of your posts in this thread have any links

And because jfc you're lazy: Here is a study by the Harvard Business Review showing increased productivity.

It took three clicks from Google so I can see why you'd have trouble getting to it.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

This source just states that there is a disagreement over whether work from home is more or less productive and provides survey information to show the difference in opinion.

That isn't making the argument that remote work is productive, just that workers view it as more productive and the study isn't conclusive. The closest this study gets to saying if productivity increases is "In theory, both sides could be right[.]"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

I've been posting the Economist link in several comments. I left it as presented to show where the link came from in case people argued with the source.