this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
386 points (96.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30793 readers
4708 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If only there was an objective way to measure the productivity of a commercial enterprise.... like with money... oh wait, they have been making MORE money? With LESS productive workers? Curious

[–] twoshoes@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

That's obviously all due to the hard work and visionary leadership of upper management

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 30 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Here is a link to the actual study (PDF via GDrive)

One of the authors of this paper is from the Chicago School and the Hoover Institution. Both are pro-business, anti-worker. They also don't do any research of their own, but cite other papers that show the 5-20% reduction.

However, the methodology mentioned in the papers is suspect. First, they show that remote workers have the same productivity, but work longer hours. So the net output doesn't go down, they just spend more time working. Which raises the question: How many more breaks were they taking throughout the day? Being remote means a much more flexible schedule, so it's not uncommon to take longer breaks if you're a salaried worker.

Another study was IT professionals shifting to remote work at one company at the start of the pandemic. This one showed an 18% reduction in productivity. But considering the timing of this and that company culture and procedures can contribute to this, it doesn't seem to be a valid data point.

Then they bring up some common criticisms of WFH, which I've seen and refuted since I started working from home 2009: People can't communicate, working in groups is harder, and people can't control themselves. Yawn.

Honestly, the fact that they cherry picked hybrid work as being equally productive shows me this isn't about productivity, it's about keeping offices open. Which makes sense considering one of the authors is affiliated with groups that want to prop up the commercial rental business.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 27 points 2 years ago

Let's be honest, Forbes has been a trashhole for a while.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Totally bullshit. When I'm in the office I'm constantly approached by coworkers wanting to chit chat. Sometimes even when I'm in a Teams meeting with headphones on.

[–] Urbanfox@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I probably do the same if not more work at home as I did in the office, but only "work" about 2/3 of the time.

I don't have a boss lecture me on blockchain for an hour because they were near my desk, I don't need to listen to Carla's story about her flat tyre, I don't need to get constantly distracted when I'm deep in an analysis hole because someone on maternity leave has walked in with their new baby.

The time spent caught up in boring distractions is used to put on some washing, set the roomba going, or put a pot roast in the oven freeing up more time to just chill out later on and I still get everything done.

Never mind the 2 hours a day of commuting time I get back.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I was in the office 3 days this week. Got almost nothing done. Probably got more done half of today than the last 2 days

Meetings and distractions while in person

[–] lolreconlol@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Same. We go into the office whenever the big bosses go in.. so once every couple months. We get almost no work done on those days.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Listened to a podcast about this earlier in the week. The research test case was call center workers. Seems like bullshit to generalize like this for all work types. Also, let’s remember how high productivity was during the pandemic when everyone was working from home.

For me personally, my productivity is boosted. Without a commute I end up working an additional 2 hours a day. I have more time to focus and spend less time at lunch. In the office, my coworkers and the environment is distracting. I spend an hour at lunch with my coworkers.

Additionally, all meetings are now remote. Even in the office, people call in from their desks. There is no reason to be in the office.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The reason to be in the office is that the office real estate value is going to plummet if they can't get people working in them again as demand will drop.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree that this is the real reason why everyone is being forced back to the office and why Forbes is pushing this crap. A year ago the studies all showed that remote work was great for productivity or that there was no impact. Now that a few rich people looked at their commercial property investments and didn’t like what they saw, it’s a different story. The fact is though that a lot of that commercial real estate is a waste of space built around a car-centric existence. Workers prefer remote. We should convert all that real estate into housing. We have a housing shortage. Seems like a good idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AccurstDemon@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's both decreasing productivity AND saving the economy!!!

https://fortune.com/2023/08/01/remote-work-preventing-economy-from-recession/

Such an incredible paradox 🤯

[–] catshit_dogfart@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I swear, when I'm called into the office I get fuck all nothing done. Like once in a while there's a reason for me to be on site, and I do that thing and nothing else all day.

Distractions, interruptions, noise, general discomfort. Seems every time I actually start making progress on something, a person stops by my desk and that basically erases whatever I did. So it always ends with "I'll do it tomorrow when I'm at home".

[–] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

I dunno giving people more freedom tends to improve their productivity and they get more work done in less time than some micro manging wanker

[–] zikk_transport2@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

When I come to office (one day per week), I come to have a great time with colleagues. No one forces me, I can work fully remote, it's just nice to have colleagues around. We go for a vape, for a lunch, for a walk. Good times. Ohh, and also few meetings that day, since I live ~150km away from office lol.

I openly say in office that I can't work from office. Basically socializing and that's it. Productivity almost zero.

While on the other hand, working from home is where I shine. I can fully focus on my scripting/coding/automation stuff.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm okay with decreased productivity. I don't own stock in the company.

[–] yuun@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You also most likely don't get paid more for being more productive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] covecove@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

good thing it reduces productivity! we produce too much shit anyway.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My work actually added a productivity tracking tool during the forced remote work during the pandemic and actually found there's no reduction in productivity. My CEO decided to remodel our office to an event space to ensure there's no way for us to go back to mandatory work from office.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is the way.

[–] FlashyWierz@ttrpg.network 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's funny how these kinds of articles always read exactly the same. I honestly want to know what offices they are using for these supposed metrics because it seems like people are doing everything they can to just endure and waste time while in actual offices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mino@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Cries in real estate value

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Look I work from home, I think everyone who can (and wants to) work from home should work from home most of the time. But people are definitely less productive working from home, and I think the people who say that most people are more productive are delusional.

There are more important things than just raw productivity numbers, western workers have been working far too hard and far too long for the last half century, and I think we should return to a more humane approach to working.

Also froma purely selfish capitalist perspective I don't neccesarily think the productivity boost of being in person is worth all the costs of a bigger office, cleaning staff etc.

[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But how do you define "productive"?

I work from home and I get the same amount of work done. However if you define it as, "Doing X amount of work in Y amount of time," then yeah I'm less productive because nowadays instead of getting that work done in an 8-hour shift I take about 10–12 hours to do it.

Same work, same day, so my productivity hasn't changed. I just take longer to do it by taking breaks, going out to long lunches with friends, and my stress level is almost non-existent!

I find that to be a very equitable trade-off: Almost no job-related stress for a slightly longer working day.

[–] Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There's also to take into consideration the fact that people experience dips of productivity throughout the day. Like, I'd never be able to start something that requires most of my brain power after 3.

For others it's early morning.

So, when I was in the office I would just kill time, go on coffee breaks or just do fucking nothing until it was time to go home, and I know for a fact that it was like that for most of my colleagues.

No one works 8 hours straight out of an 8 hours work day. Working from home just removes the torture of sticking around looking busy.

I actually complete from home the same amount of tasks I used to at the office, really, because my productivity (and that of others) wasn't constant there either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But people are definitely less productive working from home, and I think the people who say that most people are more productive are delusional

Except pretty much every study done on this has said the exact opposite. I am much more productive when I'm home. My team is much more productive when working from home and hard data backs it up. I literally cannot think of one thing about the office that I miss or made me more productive.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I miss distracting coworkers with conversations instead of working! /s

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

What about the ice cold AC in the winter?

[–] Beardwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

My ability to close a door and sit, focus, and develop in silence makes me not only more productive, but also happier. I’ve done some of the best work of my career over these past 3+ years. I used to wear headphones 50+ hours a week, now it’s only when i go for a walk every morning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The few people I know who are against remote working are the type of persons that don't have any non-family social life outside workplace and are freeking out, because their coffee break chit-chats disappeared.

They still base their view on the idea that people are spineless and sooner or later start slacking off.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As a work from homer who gets twice as much done in half the time, I'm eyeballing your own delusion xD

And this isn't a self assessment, it comes from my boss, who is fighting tooth and nail to keep us from having to go back into the office with numbers and spreadsheets proving it.

These decisions are top down and have very little to do with what's actually happening on the front line.

[–] CorrosiveCapital@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

All the studies show literally the opposite. Maybe you're less productive, but that makes you the outlier.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Long term burnout also kills productivity.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And having to hire someone new and train them because the freedom they enjoyed is no longer available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bsides@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That needs to be backed up by data and not just what people think. And reliable data needs scientific study, with proper time and people for the answer to be minimally reliable. Working from home is different from the office, we can establish that - all the rest are just thoughts or delusions from both sides.

Having said that, I agree 100% with the conclusion. We don’t need more productivity to make more money for profit only. We need investment for our personal lives too.

[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Because showering, eating, driving are productive vs get up and get started?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gamey@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Fuck Forbes!

[–] Schroed4@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A lot of people seem to just be reacting to this without reading and understand. Granted, Forbs does not go sufficiently in depth to the findings to make this easy.

From what I've read on this, the underlying study here has valuable information that we can all use, understand, and digest.

Does your role require a lot of colaberation? You may need to ensure you have something better than email and phones to replace your ability to talk to someone who would have otherwise sat next to you.

Do you have a lot of junior employees? You will likely need to spend more effort on ensuring they get the quality training they need.

Like.... Sure. A CEO could easily read the title of this article and decide to just bring everyone back to the office without thinking critically. But that doesn't mean we should do the opposite we should be arming ourselves with this information so we can know how to counter our boss's arguments to ensure we can get what we want.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are tons of other studies that show massive increases in productivity. These bullshit studies are probably sponsored by commercial real estate landlords. They're losing $850B per year since 2020.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Lmaooooooo Forbes runs a story on a report that's still in draft (the references section header reads very incomplete), just to spread propaganda that "working from home doesn't work!!!!!!!!"

I like going into the office sometimes and the one I'm in is real nice, but I know some are awful, and commutes can be way longer than mine! (one-way 40 minutes by bus).

The same study says hybrid work (1-4 of 5 days remote work) provided on average a small positive change in productivity.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Sure, some people work better when surrounded by colleagues. Those people usually know that and will seek out on-site work, because it probably also makes them happier.

People who are more efficient at home probably also feel better at home and will seek out remote work.

If you want a much smaller hiring pool, more office upkeep costs and more transport emissions, sure make everyone come into the office... it's so dumb to do this.

IMO if your sector lends itself to remote work and it's not working for your company, you're doing something else wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Toad_the_Fungus@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago
[–] TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

How else will they justify spending money on these huge office buildings (monuments to capitalists) to their investors if you aren’t there pretending to be busy?

[–] JohnnyH842@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Linking the paper "cited" in this article here. It's almost like the author didn't even read the executive summary...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kqbngD8pemqxAkZmWCOQ32Yk6PXK9eVA/view

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Do these folks factor in people who have to waste 1 hour in commuting to and from the office? Or do they pay for that as well?

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I skimmed through it real quick, but I didn’t see anything where they defined how they measured productivity. Did I miss that part?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They asked middle managers what they thought about it.

\s

[–] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'm shocked people still read: Forbes, fortune and business insider.

What ever legitimacy they once held in the business world is long gone. All three of them went click bait long before COVID (BI was always a click bait outfit) and I find their content to be on par with UK gossip rags or the National Enquirer.

Suggestion, start filtering out these three sites from your news gathering and stop sharing articles on social media from them. It'll make the world a better place!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments