this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45654 readers
3508 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Be very afraid of immigrants everyone!

Scaremongering immigrants, barf.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Here I thought the worst part was a child being sexually assaulted, but I guess the worst part was the idea of outrage being directed at the perpetrator.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's not outrage being directed at the perpetrator, it's outrage being directed at an entire demographic of people of which the perpetrator happens to belong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

We must have read two different articles. Can you quote where in the linked article it said that?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Oh I don't know maybe the first three words?

MONSTERS APPEAL MIGRANT

Or the next three words that follow

the MONSTER migrant

Instead of maybe "the rapist", no we got to tie in that he is a migrant in all caps, at every possible turn.

Also further down referred to as

the MONSTER

Or

the migrant

Oh and also let's rope in some unrelated burglar who also happens to be a migrant.

All very easy to spot so I figure you're not really asking in good faith, just like someone who has an agency in "just asking questions" would do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So you believe a child rapist isn't a monster, and that we aren't allowed to have heated discourse about the legal loopholes being utilized for foreign criminals to escape justice?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nope, not what we were talking about mate. Op said:

That's not outrage being directed at the perpetrator, it's outrage being directed at an entire demographic of people of which the perpetrator happens to belong.

You said :

It's not in the article, it's in the comment you were replying to. What am I missing?

So don't try to move the goalposts just because you talked shit, I'm sick of this bullshit.

We were talking about why a, admittedly monstrous, rapist needs to be used to demonize a whole demographic. You pretended like that wasn't in the article, I proved it was, that is the fucking conversation we're having here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still no relevant response to what I pointed out, buddy,.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not obligated to invest any more serious energy into you, bud. We're allowed to disengage if we feel someone lost the plot.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

just an observation, but replying to them is not disengagement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You want some engagement too now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Dr of what? Sealioning?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Are you a little bit slow?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not in the article, it's in the comment you were replying to. What am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What am I missing?

All the context.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Assuming you are not trolling:

The Sun is being criticized for:

  • targeting a group instead of an individual
  • using scare language when describing this group

Let's say I want to report on "Police finds wanted man hiding in sofa" (currently on BBC with that headline)

My hateful newspaper do a quick check of his Twitter, and go with "Wanted criminal TRANS ALLY found CRAWLING inside leather furniture"