this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
766 points (100.0% liked)

science

17422 readers
489 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago (25 children)

I'm still afraid of long-c. I insisted that we wore masks in airports and on flights when we took a trip last month. We live life in a normal fashion everywhere else (because we're vaxxed and boosted), but I wasn't willing to risk that environment.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Do masks help the wearer? Last time I heard it didn't. Probably wrong.

Either way, good for you...even if it only helps others that's a good reason!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They still block droplets from reaching the wearer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The droplet theory was dropped within the first few months. It turns out it's not just COVID; many infections we thought were spread by droplets are actually airborne.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, thanks for the info. How effective are n95s and/or surgical/cloth masks given that information?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Surgical/cloth are pretty much useless for COVID. N95s buy you temporary protection unless you've got the special face fittings needed to actually seal your face. It depends on the environment you're in but the worst case scenarios (like enclosed spaces without high airflow), the last study I saw was on the Delta variant and they said about 15 minutes if both parties are masked. It does get better from there though, with good ventilation you might have a few hours, and being outdoors you're actually pretty safe.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It helps to check whether or not the things you say are true before you declare them.

In this case, it is not true that they are "pretty much useless for COVID."

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7510705/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

This article is from before they dropped droplet theory later in 2020. In the section titled "Factors to Consider when Using Cloth Masks to Protect Wearers and to Prevent Spread of Infection during the COVID-19 Pandemic":

The primary transmission routes for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are thought to be inhalation of respiratory droplets and close contact; therefore, WHO recommends wearing medical masks during routine care and using respirators during aerosol-generating procedures and other high-risk situations (17). However, SARS-COV-2 is a novel pathogen, and growing evidence indicates the possibility of airborne transmission.

They then go on to explain that cloth masks are the option of last resort and are not very useful. Surgical masks with proper fitting around the face and a certain minimum rating for water resistance will help, but most of the "surgical" masks we were all buying do not have enough layers and no water resistance ratings, and who among us got training on how to properly fit a mask to our faces?

Dropping a link and calling it information when you don't understand the content or haven't read it is not productive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

N95 masks block more than droplets too, they are quite effective

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)