this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
946 points (99.8% liked)

politics

23918 readers
3372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

In an emotional monologue, John Oliver urged undecided and reluctant voters to support Kamala Harris, emphasizing her policies on Medicare, reproductive rights, and poverty reduction.

Addressing frustrations over the Biden administration’s Gaza policy, he acknowledged the struggle for many voters yet cited voices like Georgia State Rep. Ruwa Romman, who supports Harris despite reservations.

Oliver warned of the lasting consequences of a second Trump term, including potential Supreme Court shifts.

Oliver said voting for Harris would mean the world could laugh at this past week’s photo of an orange, gaping-mouthed Trump in a fluorescent vest and allow Americans to carry on with life without worrying about what he might do next.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (7 children)

maybe he should tell kamala how important it is and to do everything possible to gain voters.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Either Trump will win, or Harris will win. Choose one to help.

Clearly, obviously, Harris stands a better chance of helping Palestinians than does Trump.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

harris being better is a low bar and i can't support the same system & people that genocided my ancestors out of existence in this country; especially after claiming to abhor it for decades once the trail of tears footnote/paragraph became standard in american history books.

i don't want to be a party to re-legitimizing genocide as acceptable political collateral damage, so i'm voting third party in a solidly blue state and doing so ensures that my vote could never support trump in any way thanks to the same electoral college that gives trump a chance of winning; i'm using the system against itself and i hope others do the same.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (31 children)

Respectfully, what you wrote doesn't change the binary choice at play:

Trump or Harris will become President no matter what you do.

You could at least help my daughter, my mother, my sister by ensuring the one who supports women's rights gets elected? Who supports LGBTQ+? Who supports climate change initiatives? That's even pretending Harris is equally bad on Gaza or that things couldn't obviously get worse for Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Don’t be silly, those things don’t matter because reasons. But the genocide which we can’t directly control in any way? That is the only thing that truly matters.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's funny is their action here means they're condoning genocide in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Leninists 100% unironically do. Though I'm sure they'll try to convince you that it's not a genocide somehow. Despite supporting it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 7 months ago (2 children)

https://psychology-spot.com/basic-laws-of-human-stupidity/?origin=serp_auto

Doing anything else other than voting for Harris in this regard is firmly in the stupid category. Trump would be worse in this regard. You are not only hurting yourself but others as well.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stupid people really don't like being called stupid, and in my experience, will be stupid harder just to show you.... Something!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Lost cause anyway then. Fuck them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

i live in a solidy blue state and voting third party so my vote could never support trump in any way thanks to the same electoral college that's helping trump to win; i'm using the system against itself as you should too whenever you have the chance.

i'm also sure that my ancestors would agree with me that being party to re-legitimizing genocide as acceptable political collateral damage and at the hands of the same system & people that genocided them out of existence in this country is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wanna guess the number of people that thought that same thing in 2016?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

wanna guess how much democrats learned from it in 2016?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Obviously not nearly enough, since you’re literally repeating the same mistake.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (10 children)

That the far left vote is fickle and that it's better to try to cater to Dick and Liz Chaney and hope for the solid neoconservative vote instead??

Yeah, abstain from voting harder. Let's see where that gets ya. If you want to pull the party left, the. Prove to the party that there is a left they can pull to.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is accepting someone’s support with literally nothing in trade really “catering to” though?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What are you trying to accomplish by posting this stuff? What are you actually accomplishing by posting this stuff?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"Trump couldn't possibly win anyway, so I'm going to make a protest vote."

Why does that sound so familiar?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

My my, the display of privilege and ignorance. Especially predictable from an ML domain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago (8 children)

We all know that she needs to do. They have the power.

Instead we're going to end up like the 2016 elections when there were these "Bernie or bust" voters that basically gave away the election to Donald Trump instead of voting for Hillary.

Except this time it'll be over Israel and their genocide.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's even stupider is Trump would more than likely be worse in this regard.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

There's no need for "more than likely" in that sentence.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

I was one of those Bernie guys but I learned my lesson after 2016, I voted for sleepy Joe and I already voted for Kamala.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

i'm expecting another 2016 too and; just like now; people were telling her campaign that rejecting your most fervent supporters to court voters who equate kamala's relative flawlessness with trump's ineptitude doesn't get you votes.

the one silver lining in this upcoming cloud is that they're using all of my identities to virtue signal as it pertains to project 2025 and; if kamala loses; that will become a failed political wedge strategy and help ensure that it will never be employed again.

when we enact the few remaining parts of project 2025 that we haven't done yet since 1981; mutual aid is going to matter in a similar way that i experienced it during the aid/hiv crisis the last time our gov't did little except make a public show of support while idly sitting by and letting thousands of people die and i hope that the future's younger vulnerability minorities aren't so easily manipulated by those same people who cashed in on ensuring that they're minorities.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

that rejecting your most fervent supporters

Is this also you?

i left the democrat fold after dadt & doma and the ensuing decades have proved to me that it was the right decision

Pick a lane dude.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I was going to bury this lower in the thread but I think this deserves a top line reply.

she could literally just pay lip service the day of the election where it can do the least amount of damage when it comes to moderate voters and that would gain the support of people like me; but she won't

So let's make this perfectly clear for everyone else: this person would sacrifice the rights of women/people of color/lgbtq+ people, accelerate genocide in Gaza/Ukraine/elsewhere, and completely doom any action on climate change.. because they want lip service on an issue they don't actually care about. Wonder why that is?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

How nice it must be to go through life blaming everyone else for your own stupidity and bad decisions

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)