this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
557 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24176 readers
2971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump and Republicans are falsely framing his 2024 election win as a historic “landslide” and sweeping mandate, despite the data showing otherwise.

Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968, and his 307 electoral votes rank low in U.S. history.

Crucial Senate and House gains were limited, with Republicans relying on gerrymandering for their narrow House majority.

This exaggeration of victory serves to justify potential power expansions, but the facts debunk claims of an unprecedented or overwhelming mandate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (6 children)

My choice was revolution or status quo.

I picked, and continue to pick, revolution

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I picked, and continue to pick, revolution

Contrary to what you may believe, sitting at home and posting on lemmy is not a revolutionary act.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in making the feds' job easier by proving myself to you. How about you do something meaningful for your community instead of patting yourself on the back for filling in a useless bubble in support of diet fascism

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s nice dear. Now run along. The grown ups are talking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Contrary to your belief, posting on Lemmy isn't the only thing everyone does...

Like, I've been posting a lot to lemmy... This Saturday, I'm going to the range with a close group of family. Before shooting time, we're doing a STB refresher course. Sunday, over dinner, we'll be planning out the garden plots on the street.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well the revolution you picked got us 4 more years of Trump so 😬

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Nah, the DNC's choice to run with Harris, and doing it last minute, coupled with a focus on trying to convince hungry USians that the economy is great, so they should stop whining did it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make" mfer

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

^ literally people who voted for Harris, lmao. Sacrificing others for your own temporary safety

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

revolution? No candidate is or ever will offer revolution. That's not a choice you can make at the polls

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exactly? While I did vote for De La Cruz since I was there anyway to vote on other races/amendments, the context of this discussion is people who didn't vote

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean not voting is not picking revolution either, it's just handing more power to those who do vote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Voting at all legitimizes the system, and lulls people into a false sense of satisfaction with having "done their part." Abstaining is valid

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cool, lemme know when y'all get started. I'm not seeing any torches and pitchforks yet, or even people with baseball bats and masks. When "revolution" finally gets off of Lemmy/Matrix/Signal and into the streets, I'll believe it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Ooo I get to say the thing!

Read theory

Edit: (so you'll understand what praxis is)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Ah, theoretical revolution. The most effective kind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Read it. But a few million comrades living out actual solidarity and comradeship, joining mutual aid coalitions, feeding unhoused people and refusing consumerism still isn't affecting the systems of hierarchy and oppression, monopolization of violence, rules of place, terror, and exploitation. The quiet Revolution in the homes of families and certain workplaces, some scattered neighborhoods and the hearts and minds of comrades around the nation still isn't stopping the cops from dragging us to the camps, the landlords evicting us, and the employers squeezing us. We've tried educating, discussion, solidarity, activism, and some of us even tried sabotage and outright violence, for over a hundred years, yet the imperial core seems strong as ever, and the zones of accumulation continue reaping profits and resources from the areas of dispossession. Children are still dying from weapons bought with our blood and sweat and labor. How then do we truly dismantle these systems of oppression, when our own relatives call us brainwashed traitors, when our neighbors support the oppression of others, and the very product of our labor is used to perpetuate violence?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha, is it a hidden secret revolution? I see no sign of it or it's effects...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Just because I choose it doesn't mean it 'wins'. Just like how y'all chose Harris and she didn't win

I do my own local praxis, but I assume we live in different places