this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
329 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72895 readers
2932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm well aware. I'm also aware that the various levels of error correction in a typical computer manage to retain the data integrity potentially for years or even decades.

Google bragging about an hour, regardless of it being a different type of computer, just sounds pathetic, especially given all the money being invested in the technology.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Traditional bits only have to be 0 or 1. Not a coherent superposition.

Managing to maintain a stable qubit for a meaningful amount of time is an important step. The final output from quantum computation is likely going to end up being traditional bits, stored traditionally, but superpositions allow qubits to be much more powerful during computation.

Being able to maintain a cached superposition seems like it would be an important step.

(Note: I am not even a quantum computer novice.)