this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
472 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32843 readers
3941 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

there’s more than shown here and it’s more than just these users too 😭

if you find the thread don’t piss in the popcorn (brigade) but also please maybe don’t bring it back here i don’t want 400 notifications of entry level β€œis almond milk milk” vegan discourse

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Unequivocally, yes you are, and at that, you're one of the most agonizingly stubborn and disinformed ones I've ever talked to.

Edit: Sharing this conversation here in the context of them being banned from /c/vegan so users can understand how completely full of shit this user is (yes, their actual argument they started at /c/vegan is that vegans starting from a position of "humans have rights" is a flawed position to start from and thus invalidates their argument for veganism):

Conversation between commie and I after they were banned

Edit 2: Oh, and they have this thing where they like to reply to a single comment with several comments while claiming it's because they "don't want to engage in a Gish gallop" (paraphrased), meanwhile facilitating a Gish gallop by making an unfollowable branching tree of comments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm the authority in my own beliefs, and I am not antivegan

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You sure love to argue against points that you perceive as supporting veganism, though!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It’s all about downplaying and denying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i only argue against specious claims. I think there are fine reasons to choose to be vegan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You sure love to argue against posts that you perceive as supporting veganism. You spent a whole day arguing against "most male cows are killed for meat before adulthood"!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you don't know what my perception is. you can only speak to your own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The evidence is your post history. You can't hide your bias behind "you don't know that". Yes I do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you are making a leap of logic. you don't know what you seem to think you know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're expecting me to ignore your post history in favour of your assertions, just like you expect me to ignore facts about dairy farming in favour of your biases. It's not working.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm expecting you to defer to my own authority about my own perception.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're expecting me to believe implausible things that are inconsistent with your extensive anti vegan comment history.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Says the guy with the extensive anti vegan post history.

I think at times, in the heat of the moment, when someone calls you out on it, sometimes you nearly believe that, but anyone who reads your post history cannot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

your characterization of my comments does not change the fact

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Of course not. And your mischaracterisation of your comments and position and implausible assertions about them don't successfully edit away your extensive fact-denying anti-vegan comment history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

your link shows the same as the op thread: I'm primarily interested in a factual, scientifically accurate discussion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My link shows that you're interested in muddying the waters by either intentionally spreading disinformation or by speaking with absolute confidence about subjects you clearly lack the capacity to understand even the most fundamental principles of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

anyone can read it and see i grasp the subject, and reject unscientific work.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You grasp the subject so much that you're too fucking stupid to understand the most basic facets of supply and demand that a literal 10-year-old could understand. lmao okay

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I'm still unsure whether they actually believe what they are saying makes any kind of sense and could actually be deemed a rational thought or whether they are just pulling our legs. Either way, engaging in any kind of discussion with them should probably just be avoided

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Educated stupid