this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
540 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67669 readers
5585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
540
Watching the Generative AI Hype Bubble Deflate (ash.harvard.edu)
submitted 3 months ago by sirboozebum@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
227 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Surely you can see there is a difference between marginal improvement with respect to energy and not improving.

[โ€“] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, I see the difference as in hitting the logarithmic tail that shows we are close to the limit. I also realize that exponential cost is a defacto limit on improvement. If improving again for chatGPT7 will cost 10 trillions, I don't think it will ever happen, right?