this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
355 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46135 readers
3468 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Andrei Kotov, a Russian travel agency director accused of organizing LGBTQ+ tours, died in pre-trial detention in Moscow.

Authorities claim his death was a suicide, but rights groups highlight previous reports of beatings and abuse during his arrest.

Kotov was charged with “extremist activities” after Russia banned the LGBTQ+ movement as extremist in 2023, intensifying its crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights.

He denied organizing specific LGBTQ+ events, calling them ordinary tours.

His death has raised concerns about the treatment of detainees and the broader suppression of dissent in Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Police in the US clearly do a lot of very bad brutal things, but they still have measure of self-control.

was that self control in the room with them when they beat that that guy to death last weekend while he was still cuffed down the entire time?

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever dealt with russian police? And if yes, in what context? What is your russian like, what level is it?

Keep in mind I explicitly said that US police are brutal.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Why does it have to be a competition?

ACAB!

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You did when you tried to make a pretty weak equivalency argument.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

That's the other side to the same shitty coin

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because "ACAB" is not a viable approach. Even in a society where all the oligarchs and their lackeys are serving multi-decade prison terms, you still need a police institution.

And framing this as a "competition" inherently whitewashes the crimes of the russian police.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You misunderstand ACAB in the same way your buddies understand "all lives matter"

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why do you assume I or my buddies have any opinion on “all lives matter”. I am not from the US.

I am talking about practical, real world matters. A good police institution, one that is loyal to society and not to oligarchs/crooks is something to strive for. Meaningless, self-indulgent polemics such as "ACAB" (if you can even call this a polemic) is not the way to go.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Then you might be forgivable for not understanding what ACAB means; but not so if you refuse to accept that people who look like me in my country are generally aware that having to involve the police for anything can be just as dangerous as it was for the poor person in op's post.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Where did I say I don't recognize the brutality and the dysfunction of the US police?

So what do I not understand about ACAB?

I am not talking about US internal polemics. I am saying that a concept such as "ACAB" is not fundamentally not viable. You need a police force. One that takes the side of the people when things get tough.