this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

10559 readers
709 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You can go a lot higher than 1000 without optimizing for UPS, they’ve made a lot of performance improvements over the years. Highly hardware dependent, of course

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have a very high end computer and was able to flirt with 10kSPM but having to move to beltless designs is a real drag.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is SPM typically considered continuous production without slowdowns forever, or, is there some unwritten rule about needing to maintain +1000 for a specific amount of time?

I can spike to 700 SPM at times, but it only lasts for a minute or two until a resource or two gets completely sucked dry. (Until I get better production, I just pace my research and buffer enough resources to keep research at 100% for a bit.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's meant to be continuous production. Usually this kind of base is left on continuously and people will post the 10 hour production graphs