this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
371 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They are running a drama/scandal focussed channel. Of course they are going to be controversial at times.

[โ€“] [email protected] 108 points 3 months ago (2 children)

investigative journalism is drama now ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just to make a more meta comment, this is a case where cynicism is definitely not helping. We need better journalists to do this kind of deep dive without concern for losing a revenue stream. And not just in gaming hardware, either.

If we cynically label every journalist that does it as "drama mongers", we're only hurting ourselves.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I haven't been super happy about how GN approaches their journalism since they tend to sensationalize a bit, but I at least appreciate that they are pretty accurate when it comes to actual factual statements.

His heart's in the right place, I just don't like the tone.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is there any case where cynicism is helpful?

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

When being scammed.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The way they are phrasing things is very sensationalist. They are very much not doing dry, factual content. This probably is required to make a profit, but too me is still drama.

[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean not doing factual content, they literally had a lawyer with them in their video about NZXT scams. They also showed tons of proof how NZXT was lying to the customers. NZXT CEO was eventually forced to do an interview regarding these news. Is it still drama to you?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They aren't doing dry content. They do emotional but factual content.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

that's because they are forced to by the yt algorithm: you flat out cannot run a business on yt without resorting to clickbait titles, stupid thumbnails, and a bit of sensationalization, because the algorithm will deprioritize your video and unfairly limit your viewership if you don't do those things.

Steve's videos are generally very much dry, factual reporting using fairly neutral language; or in other words: really decent reporting!

if you want to complain about some tech youtuber doing the exact things you complain about, look at linus and jay...

there's some good reasons why steve is one of only a handful of tech channels i still subscribe to...

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hot take, who cares if it's mildly emotional as long as it delivers the truth. The issue with sensationalism is that it usually hides the truth, lies, or tells half truths. If the facts are all right there, who care?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Reporting is not to be emotional. Editorials are where the emotion goes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This is such a weird position to take, they're doing investigative journalism, but you're upset because they're not dry and emotionless about it?

[โ€“] [email protected] 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not really. Reviews and weekly news are still their bread and butter. They do a few of these deep dive investigations per year.

And they do very detailed reviews.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They seem to be doing far more of them lately.

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Companies are going to shit more quickly these days

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it seems to be a personal mission for Steve, and he seems to be going a bit harder on them as well. I remember the fan controller fire risk thing was like 2-3 videos, each about 10-20 min, whereas recent "investigative journalism" pieces are more like 1-1.5 hours, and the details seem a bit more spread out.

I appreciate what he's doing, I just wish it was a little less dramatic, but I guess that sells clicks and views.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Your being downvoted because they cannot handle the truth.