[-] [email protected] 2 points 54 minutes ago

And I’ve since reversed those bans and reminded him of the rules.

He's not going to stop banning people for disliking genocide.

if you have something with him, take it up with him.

I have. Got me banned from most of startrek.website. He got super pissed off when I said that centrists hate communists so much because they're still salty about the fall of berlin.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 hour ago

Wait... it does make you go blind?

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 hour ago

She said what she was coached to say by the pedo administration.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

I've interacted with your fellow mod plenty in the past to know everything he's about.

He shrieks "tankie" at everyone who disagrees with him, particularly at anyone who disagrees with his support for netanyahu's genocide. And you made sure he got to keep his banhammer to use as a disagree button.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Why are you snooping around in someone's comment history for irrelevant gotchas?

Oh right. Someone criticized pugjesus and it personally offended you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

You’re not being helpful, but you are being patronizing and pedantic

Being implies a temporary condition.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Most of the time they don’t bother with the community though because their views and extremism don’t hold up to scrutiny.

I'm sure it's not because of the mods' behavior.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh good. They're fixing that. Mods were taking advantage of that bug far too often.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah it’s not a good look that Tankie now means “I don’t like genocide”.

It's what it's meant on lemmy, particularly .world, for a while now. centrists just use it like (other) republicans use "woke."

It means "this person has an opinion I know I'm morally wrong about. I don't want to change my position but I also don't want to look bad, so I'll pick a term I can't define and use it as a cudgel against them."

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

The banhammer is a disagree button.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Looks like @[email protected] has been going on a rampage against people who are critical of Israel lately, PTB for sure.

Lately?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

That’s a bit reductionist

But only a bit.

105
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii) (Nev.) all voted "yes" in addition to Schumer, — as did Maine's Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats.

111
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
203
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In each of the separate lawsuits state regulators filed, dozens of internal communications, documents and research data were redacted — blacked-out from public view — since authorities entered into confidentiality agreements with TikTok.

But in one of the lawsuits, filed by the Kentucky Attorney General’s Office, the redactions were faulty. This was revealed when Kentucky Public Radio copied-and-pasted excerpts of the redacted material, bringing to light some 30 pages of documents that had been kept secret.

view more: next ›

Ensign_Crab

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago