idk how anyone can take seriously a presidential campaign from a 'party' that doesn't have a single elected seat at any level of government.
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22800 readers
2855 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
$$$$$$$$
I mean, Ross Perot?
He ran as an independent. Still didn't get a single electoral vote.
Major spoiler though. In 1992, he got like 20% of the overall vote in an election Clinton won by 6%
I don't think anyone would argue third party candidates can't be effective spoilers. I think that's at least partially why they enjoy as much support as they do. But they're not serious candidates for the office and anyone that votes for them is likely helping the party furthest from their values.
Would still have to form a coalition with someone or be a lame duck or his entire term. Ultimately boiling down to being just another member of that faction. There's very little say or control.
So is No Labels a dark money funded movement to funnel votes away from Biden or Trump?
More like a vanity project of Enlightened Centrist (m/b)illionaires. They're legitimately not launching a ticket because they can't win, just like they said. So they're not funneling votes from anywhere.
Sane people could have told you, it was never going to work, especially not at the presidential level.
People online love to jump to conspiracies over logical conclusions. I think this comment is probably the most likely situation. There's already a massive network of dark money on the right, they wouldn't need to fund another group
Not being able to find a serious candidate probably didn't help. Yes, please tell me more about the elites Mr Kennedy who has never worked before
It was created to help Trump, but they realized that they would take more GOP votes than Dems, so they stopped.