this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
286 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

24871 readers
286 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I was wondering what happened to the proposal from a month ago....

    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I understood Matthew's position as "this should be discussed in the Workstation WG first", not as a "no":

    in favor of the process outlined above (tl;dr: talk to the Workstation WG, and if that does not come to a satisfying outcome, file a Council ticket for next possibilities).

    Post

    It also seemed more likely that they would promote KDE without demoting Gnome.

    But was there a follow-up on that (e.g. in the Workstation WG)?

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I understood Matthew’s position as “this should be discussed in the Workstation WG first”, not as a “no”

    And later he said it's not up to the community but the Fedora Council which at least partially consists of unelected Red Hat-appointed people and all decisions need to be on a consensus-basis, so a single corporate-appointed person can veto everything. FESCO (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is democratic, Fedora Council is not.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure I follow... Did the Fedora Council actually take a decision?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The Fedora leadership is elected the the community. Also most the community does not want to deal with KDE. KDE is great for power users and people who like customization. Outside of that most people want stability and simplicity both of which KDE is not.

    The other issue is the installer and the enterprise. If Fedora switched to KDE by default then the downstream distros would need to as well as Fedora is the testing ground for RHEL, Rocky and Alma. I can't imagine anyone wanting to run KDE on a server or corporate workstation.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

    The Fedora leadership is elected the the community.

    "The Fedora Council is composed of a mix of representatives from different areas of the project, named roles appointed by Red Hat, and a variable number of seats connected to medium-term project goals." --https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/

    Also most the community does not want to deal with KDE.

    Too bad we can't know this for sure because the discussion and a vote was shut down. The leader was clearly afraid of the possible outcome. No need to "drop the mic" if it was actually so clear cut.

    Outside of that most people want stability and simplicity both of which KDE is not.

    Baseless claims.

    The other issue is the installer and the enterprise. If Fedora switched to KDE by default then the downstream distros would need to as well as Fedora is the testing ground for RHEL, Rocky and Alma.

    Wrong. Fedora switched to btrfs as well despite the fact that it's unsupported by RHEL. Outside the RH sphere of influence, openSUSE manages to offer Plasma equally next to Gnome even though Gnome is default in SLE.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I can't imagine anyone wanting to run KDE on a server or corporate workstation.

    While I generally agree that there's probably not much appetite among the distributions for switching default, this point seems weird. I don't see why KDE would be any less desired than Gnome in that segment.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    To be fair, there is and has been a KDE spin. I can see an argument for gnome, as it's overall the simpler environment. Simple defaults has been fedoras thing for a long time.

    [–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I can see an argument for gnome, as it’s overall the simpler environment. Simple defaults has been fedoras thing for a long time.

    They could make that argument then and not just close the topic by declaring it a trademark issue.

    [–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Fedora is recognized as the Gnome distro, though. It really is a branding issue.

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Fedora is recognized as the Gnome distro, though.

    Things could change. That why it was brought up for debate. The debate could have concluded that changing defaults is not the right move.

    It really is a branding issue.

    And what would be the trademark(!) issue? The default desktop edition is called "Fedora Workstation", not "Fedora Gnome", so the branding is not tied to Gnome in any way. Seems more like an attempt to kill a discussion where the popular vote might be undesirable.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt in that they misspoke when saying trademark. Clearly it’s not that, but those nuances are not universally known.

    And branding is not something up to popular vote. It’s, by definition, an image someone or some organization wants to project to the public. To them, they have spins for other DEs/WMs and that’s enough. And why wouldn’t it be?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

    And branding is not something up to popular vote.

    The suggestion wasn't about changing branding. It was about changing one default, just like when PipeWire replaced PulseAudio or when btrfs was elected to be the default FS. The product would still be called Fedora Workstation and kept its trademarks, logos,...

    To them, they have spins for other DEs/WMs and that’s enough. And why wouldn’t it be?

    Who is "them"? Clearly not the Fedora community or the community-elected Engineering Steering Committee. The ability to vote on that was taken away from them by one person unilaterally declaring that. FESCO would have decided to just keep Gnome. Looks to me like that one person would not wan to take any chances that the community-elected committee might vote differently.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    The vote likely would of favored gnome. Fedora is enterprise oriented and focuses on being a new version of the stable enterprise. KDE changes very quickly and they do not fix bugs before introducing new features.

    If anything the alternative would be xfce4 but that's not viable for other reasons.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    The vote likely would of favored gnome.

    No need to kill it then. Obviously the Red Hat representative got cold feet.

    Fedora is enterprise oriented and focuses on being a new version of the stable enterprise.

    Fedora describes itself as a community-led distribution, not as a corporate beta test for RHEL: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    The enterprise is part community. Rocky is part of the community.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Rocky is part of the community.

    Rocky Linux is part of the Fedora community? WTF?

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

    What WTF? They are part of the community

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't understand the simpler argument. Installing and using extensions and gnome-tweaks to change basic settings is not simpler. And I strongly dislike a large number of defaults.

    With KDE Plasma, defaults make more sense to me so I barely have to change configuration. If I really need to, the setting is there and easily used.

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

    Since KDE changed to dbl-click by default, the only thing I change is Numlock on boot. 10 seconds to fix, and I know it'll stay changed because KDE is allergic to removing user settings.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    KDE is not good for stability and control. It is consumer oriented instead of enterprise oriented.

    There isn't anything wrong with the KDE spin. If you want KDE it is available and well supported.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Wait are you saying is Gnome is better for enterprise environments cause it's harder for the users to mess things up? If so, yeah I can see that. It's perfect for the simple-minded. Not saying that all Gnomes are simpletons, just that I too would rather have some boomers Gnome.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Simple defaults has been fedoras thing for a long time.

    So has been KDE's for a long time now. Even more so in Plasma 6.

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    "Simple by default, powerful when needed" - KDE

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Isnt fedora like the last distro that doesnt symlink /bin and /sbin to /usr/bin?

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    I'm glad Fedora comes with the most usable no-bs/out-of-the-way (in my subjective experience) DE by default. Yes I do run it with Tweaks and a few extensions, but otherwise I have no need for extensive customization for customization’s sake (which seems so many ppls problem with GNOME, smth that I couldn't find more irrelevant), since everything about its UI/UX is so intuitive. I understand if people don't like its opinionated workflow, but it's just right for me personally...

    I don't get the proposal either way bc Fedora has always been the spearhead of vanilla GNOME and there is an official KDE spin iirc

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I don't really get what people mean when describing Gnome or any DE as "out of the way". I've never felt like KDE was "in my way".

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I really couldn't find a better way to describe how it feels to use gnome. I am used almost all tiling window managers through the years. I always got lost in configuring my setup. I know I didn't have to, but there was almost another step of optimization that was available to me. This is not a bad thing in and of itself, of course. I have been using gnome o arch for the past few years, a plank/dock extension, a system tray, and a clipboard manager. That's it, there is nothing to fiddle with, to distract me. It is entirely personal. I just can't stop myself from trying to optimize my desktop/workflow if there are still ways to optimize it. Before gnome I was using my WM/DE and then the applications necessary for my actual work. Now, the DE is "out of the way" and I just do what I actually have to do. But again, this is entirely personal.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    This is very similar to my experience tho I have skipped most of my ricing/customization phase with Gnome bc I just didn't feel the need to do much about it bar a few extensions

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Or you can run OpenSuSE which comes with one of the best Kde versions by default.

    It's another enterprise type distribution that's rock solid. It also has a rolling version.

    1lso it's based in Europe, which some see as a plus.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

    the Gnome devs are undeniably metaphorically tweakers on heroin tho

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Look, we knew Fedora wasn't going to drop Gnome. Gnome is almost entirely a Redhat project, it's there for the paying corporate market so it doesn't confuse the drones by offering "choices", and Fedora is the proving ground of any changes that might affect said drones. I can't even argue with the logic.

    Lots of Plasma-Fedora distros out there, like the spin and Nobara/bazzite that frankly are better starting places for most power users anyway, since you don't have to get around the repo/codec issues yourself.

    [–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

    Look, we knew Fedora wasn’t going to drop Gnome. Gnome is almost entirely a Redhat project, it’s there for the paying corporate market so it doesn’t confuse the drones by offering “choices”, and Fedora is the proving ground of any changes that might affect said drones. I can’t even argue with the logic.

    The project leader could just be honest about that instead of making BS up.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] PenisWenisGenius 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    I used to use Gnome all the time but I have to install a bunch of extensions for it to be usable. This one addon, I think it was called window list, is the most important and invaluable one of them all. There is no way I can use Gnome without it and I don't understand how other people have the patience to deal with not having that. The number of times I updated Gnome and found out window list was so out of date the only way I could get it working was if I download the source code and fix the issue myself, is too damn high. That addon should be part of Gnome by default.

    Now I use cinnamon or kde depending on which one works better in that respective distro's repository. Some installations of your favorite desktop environment come with better configs than others. For example last time I tried KDE on Ubuntu, it was a broken buggy annoying mess to the point it was was less functional than Windows 11's ui. On Arch, KDE is the epitome optimization and polish. On Arch, cinnamon is respectably borked out of the box. Cinnamon on Ubuntu usually only comes with a few bugs however I rarely end up finding a way to fix said bugs.

    LXDE is the same across distros usually but I only use it if running Linux on an absolute potato. That lack of a start menu search is awful, I don't miss those pre-search bar era uis. I need a search bar dammit.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    On Arch, KDE is the epitome optimization and polish.

    Cannot relate. At all.

    Last friday I re-installed Arch with KDE this time instead of GNOME for a change, and in these two and a half days I've already encountered more bugs and crashes than I did the entire time I was on GNOME. Kinda regretting the decision already. All that with stock applets and widgets and shit that come bundled with the DE. I don't want to imagine what things would be like if I started to mess around with third party stuff.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Idk man, EndeavourOS on KDE has been amazing to me, even on Wayland. Even the plasma 5 to 6 upgrade has been ridiculously smooth. I have a feeling arch may not be the most unified distro to judge a DE on... Hope stuff stabilizes for you a bit. That's no fun. :(

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm glad Fedora has GNOME as default. The KDE spin appears to be well-maintained enough for those interested to enjoy it.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Fedora atomic with kde (kionite) has been amazing on my laptop so far (recently moved from mint)

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    To make KDE Plasma the new default Desktop environment for future Fedora Workstation releases in place of Gnome.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yeah that was never going to happen

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Use Bazzite or Aurora if you want an amazing, Fedora Silverblue/Universal Blue-based KDE experience, it's much better than normal Fedora anyway

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How does Bazzite differ from Kinoite? I use the latter but have been hearing about the former for a while now, and was curious what exactly sets it apart from what I use and what benefits I'd have switching to it.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Gaming.

    if you game on Linux you wanna go with bazzite, games "just work" on there without any tweaking or fixing or patching. And in the rare case you do need to patch a game like gmod, they have a built in script for it like ujust fix-gmod

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

    By default it uses KDE instead of GNOME, you have the choice though. It makes some stuff easier for new users. Bazzite is also optimized for gaming and in some areas tries to mimic the Steam Deck experience pretty closely. It also includes all the Universal Blue goodness like ujust (basically a collection of scripts that is very helpful for quickly installing and setting up various things on your system). It also includes some quality-of-life improvements in the Terminal. You could compare it to Nobara, but built on top of Fedora Atomic (Kinoite). Check out their website for more information: https://bazzite.gg/

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›