jj4211

Shareholders in a company whose entire business is around being well liked globally thinks it would be a bad business move to cancel a program that is part of a good public image in favor of placating a relatively small chunk of Americans that would both be paying attention and against DEI.

They could still be pro-Trump, and not really caring about DEI, but they know the value of optics in the context of a company like Disney.

anti-DEI is pretty much code for "only white straight cisgendered males welcome". Whatever criticisms may make sense against select DEI initiatives, the anti-DEI move by the government basically involved erasing all acknowledgement of any minority or woman ever being honored for accomplishments, no matter how obviously well earned the honor was.

On a global perspective, the American flavor of "anti-DEI" panders to a relatively small group of folks at the expense of offending the vast majority of the world's population.

He and Trump are very similar. Both managed to make a bunch of other people's money tied to their personal brand and both had a whole lot of interests trying to help build them up while simultaneously running interference to keep them from making actual decisions about businesses because those folks realized what a moron that he was, until it gets out of hand and they can't control him anymore. It's a perfect storm to just make the most insufferable people, idiots who have been told their whole lives by everyone how great and smart they were by an 'in crowd'.

Even expecting Trump’s narcissism and corruption, some of his choices have been rather bizarre…

The bizarre is just being all over the place with stuff he doesn't care about, while pandering to a bunch of interests that don't make that much sense as a whole (Musk, Project 2025, Putin, Netanyahu, traditional GOP, other random folks).

I assume there's a large amount of people who do nothing but write pretty boilerplate projects that have already been done a thousand times, maybe with some very milquetoast variations like branding or styling. Like a web form doing one to one manipulations of some database from user input.

And/or a large number of people who think they need to be seen as "with it" and claim success because they see everyone else claim success. This is super common with any hype phase, where there's a desperate need for people to claim affinity with the "hot thing".

Moscow has been very friendly to him consistently since the 80s. All flattery and benefit, with zero demanded of him.

Ukraine is that country that declined to make up stuff about Biden in an incident that blew up into his first impeachment.

So I didn't have high hopes

Fortunately, no respect is due

And because a friend insisted that it writes code just fine.

It's so weird, I feel like I'm being gaslit from all over the place. People talking about "vibe coding" to generate thousands of lines of code without ever having to actually read any of it and swearing it can work fine.

I've repeatedly given LLMs a shot and always the experience is very similar. If I don't know how to do it, neither does it, but it will spit out code confidently, hallucinating function names or REST urls as needed to fit the narrative that would have been convenient. If I can't spot the logic issue with some code that isn't acting correct, it will also fail to generate useful text that would describe the problem.

If the query is within reach of copy/paste of the top stack overflow answer, then it can generate the code. The nature of LLM integration with IDEs makes the workflow easier to pull in than stack overflow answers, but you need to be vigilant as it's impossible to tell a viable result from junk, as both are presented with equal confidence and certainty. It can also do a better job of spotting issues within things like key values that are strings with typo than traditional code analysis, and by extension errors in less structured languages like Javascript and Python (where 'everything is a hash/dictionary' design prevails).

So far I can't say I've seen improvements, I see how it could be seen as valuable, but the resulting babysitting carries a cost that has been more annoying than the theoretical time saves. Maybe for more boilerplate tasks, but generally speaking those are highly wrapped by libraries already, and when I have to create significant volume of code, it's because there's no library and if there's no library, it's niche enough that the LLMs can't generate either.

I think the most credible time save was a report of refreshing an old codebase that used a lot of deprecated function and changing most of the calls to the new method without explicit human intervention. Better than tools like '2to3' for python, but still not magical either.

There's a small chance that this time could be seen as different as Putin broke a "deal" with Trump.

Putin breaking agreements with other people, ok, but Trump considers himself different and those don't count.

Having Trump be directly involved in a broken deal might be enough of an affront to bother Trump.

Long shot, more likely Putin rationalizes it away to Trump somehow

Yeah, it does some tricks, some of them even useful, but the investment is not for the demonstrated capability or realistic extrapolation of that, it is for the sort of product like OpenAI is promising equivalent to a full time research assistant for 20k a month. Which is way more expensive than an actual research assistant, but that's not stopping them from making the pitch.

There is fog and rain, which it also failed at.

Also, their cameras have missed light colored trailers, mistaking them for sky. So it doesn't take much to be like the fake painted wall.

Nearly every homeowner has unrealized gains in their house value.

Edit: Also, all these unrealized gains of the very rich would also be taxed when transacted, like the retirement funds, but there are loopholes. They can leverage that wealth without "realizing" the value.