this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23036 readers
2943 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not true. Wall Street and the wealthy are thriving, the rest of us not so much.

No amount of gaslighting from the government is gonna help pay those bills

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Did you read the article? Now, before you reflexively downvote me for saying something you didn't want to hear, hear me out.

Whether an economy is "good" or "bad" is measured through several metrics. These are—

  • Stock index performance
  • Unemployment rate
  • Inflation rate
  • Wage growth
  • People's personal financial situation

Now, stock index performance generally benefits the wealthy more than it benefits the average American, however, the article does note that the number of Americans who own 401(K) investments, which benefit from better stock index performance, has increased significantly in recent years.

The unemployment rate is definitely tied to middle-class wealth. It means that everyone who is looking for a job is eventually able to find a job. Unemployment is low, and this is good for the middle and lower class.

The inflation rate is currently just north of 3%. This is above the target 2% rate but not by much, and certainly less than the 7-9% inflation experienced immediately post-pandemic, and the US cooled inflation down to that level far faster than other Western economies (e.g. the UK and Eurozone). The inflation rate measures the price change of a basket of household goods, and the burden of high inflation is basically borne by the entire middle class. Low inflation is good for the middle and lower class.

I don't believe the article discussed wage growth, but wage growth has actually outpaced inflation in recent years due to a surge in worker power. This requires little introduction. The problem is that when people's wages rise, they give all the credit to themselves and think "Well, I'm just one of the hardworking and lucky ones." This is not true. A lot of people are getting pay raises, and employers are more willing to be generous with pay raises when the economy is good. In short, people credit increases in wages to their own hard work but blame inflation on the Government.

As stated in the article, most of the people surveyed reported that their personal financial situation improved, but they still think the overall US economy is bad. If this isn't definitive proof of what I've said earlier (that the economy is good and people just don't know it), I don't know what is

Economists are not stupid. They know that economic growth is driven by the everyday consumer and that a good economy is one that benefits the average American, not just billionaires. Understand that people on the news fixate on stock indexes because it's a single number that requires little explanation and leaves no room for nuance. When people with decades of education and experience in economics say the economy is good, we'd best listen. Rejecting this conclusion is the same Dunning-Kreuger-laced thinking that causes climate change deniers to deny the existence of that phenomenon.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Sorry, if this feels legit impossible to believe. I live in SoCal and literally everyone I know is struggling or has commented about how much more expensive rent is and how impossible it seems to get by compared to just a few years ago. Lots of people have to live with their parents/families now even though they work full time.

What do you or "economists" call it when no one (exaggerating here in case it's not obvious) in a city/state can afford rent to live on their own like they used to be able to? Put another way, what do you call it when six figures used to mean stability and now it means paycheck to paycheck for many families?

You're seriously saying people are just confused about their finances? What about all the articles about people not buying new cars and not buying this or that anymore? Why do economists think that is? That's just a coincidence?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Rich people are doing good. Poor people are taking on credit card debt to buy basic groceries. People haven’t seen raises in years, or got them only on paper (for example, I got a raise, and then in the next breath got my hours cut to where it was actually a pay cut).

If people are struggling to buy basic necessities, they won’t spend on other things, which will slow the economy.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Did you even read the post you are responding to???

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Most of what you said is false when generalised to the entire economy.

It might be true for you. It's not true for most other people. You are trying to defeat a statistic with an anecdote.

[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

the number of Americans who own 401(K) investments, which benefit from better stock index performance, has increased significantly in recent years

This is the same as saying lots of Americans have bank accounts. The accounts could be empty.

the US cooled inflation down to that level far faster than other Western economies (e.g. the UK and Eurozone)

The US did not experience the same economic effects as the UK. The UK performed Brexit which raised the cost of goods by definition, and had their price of fuel skyrocket due to the effects of the Russia-Ukraine war. The US is not dependent on Russian oil.

wage growth has actually outpaced inflation in recent years

EDIT: Wages with respect to productivity have been stagnant since 1970, but today's average worker produces far more value for their employer. Employers are not sharing their increased profits with their workers, who are making roughly the same as workers from 1970. So yes, workers got a very slight real increase in pay, but are still vastly underpaid.

The inflation rate measures the price change of a basket of household goods

No, it doesn't. That's the consumer price index.

employers are more willing to be generous with pay raises when the economy is good. In short, people credit increases in wages to their own hard work but blame inflation on the Government.

No, increased wages are not because bosses decided to be nice. Corporate profits reached records during the pandemic, paying more reduces profits. Unions and displays of labor activism in the US have expanded significantly in the past few years. People are demanding higher wages from their employers. The entire purpose of the Federal Reserve is to combat inflation. Action by the government is the only way to control inflation.

Economists are not stupid.

That's debatable, but some are certainly self-serving.

Tell me how high interest rates benefits those who have to borrow money for school, medical expenses, a car, or a first home.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It seems like you read but didn't understand what I said.

When you say that the US "didn't experience the same economic effects as the UK", I respond with "it doesn't matter". It doesn't matter why the US didn't experience a worse economy, just that it didn't. When you say that wages lagged behind inflation for the 50 years prior, I absolutely dispute that conclusion. It seems like you saw someone else talk about it, thought "this sounds true", and then didn't look at the data, which is much more mixed:

You think that the "consumer price index" is different from inflation. The consumer price index is a method for measuring inflation, and you being confused by this honestly makes me want to dismiss all remaining credibility you held. This is like if I said "temperature scales measure how hot or cold something is" and you replied, "no, that's a thermometer".

I never claimed that wages increase because employers are "nice". I assert that employers are more willing to give higher wage increases in good economic conditions, because such conditions give workers more bargaining power. Employers in better economic conditions have more money to give to wage increases, so workers are more able to extract that money through wage negotiations. Compare this to bad economic conditions when employers are going to be much less able to give raises or when the labour force is shrinking, causing supply in the labour market to outpace demand (driving down wages). If the economy is growing, there is more demand for labour, and thus suppliers of labour (workers) are able to demand higher prices (wages). Is this really so hard to grasp?

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bquintb@midwest.social 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Groceries. Are. Still. High. Where is the confusion????

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because everything costs so fucking much that the "economy" doesn't represent their daily experience

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mandelbrotvurst@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it costs me $60 to walk into the fucking grocery store.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, buy less than 4 things next time. Sheesh

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

2Avacados2 furious.

Coming this summer

[–] 01011@monero.town 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wall Street =!= "The Economy"

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The article states that most people surveyed said their personal financial situation improved but they still think the economy is bad.

Let that sink in. Most people say they are better off, but most of them still think the economy is bad. They know that they themselves are doing good but think it sucks for everyone else.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

In the telephone survey of 1,818 adults Aug. 10-14, 71% of Americans described the economy as either not so good or poor. And 51% said it's getting worse.

But 60% said their financial situation is good or excellent.

Come the fuck on dude. How can you possibly believe that? And who's upvoting all your comments?

Everything you say now is suspect if you can believe that data is representative of most Americans. Not only that, you're parroting the info everywhere like you're confident in the data and knowledgeable on the subject, and yet it's based on fucking phone interviews. What single, working mom do you think answers a random phone number and then is also willing to take an interview about the economy?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

Rich people's money is thriving under Biden. So why don't Americans believe it?

Oh, we do, we just don't like what's happening for the rest of us.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Depends on what you mean by "the economy".
Wall Street is striving, GDP is striving, but average people struggle to make rent.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

"Please, I can't afford food or housing"

Media outlets:

Economy doing great!!! Inflation down and stocks up!!!

"Okay, I guess I'll just fucking die then"

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

I looked over the metrics in the article and none of them approximate what percentage of Americans are struggling to pay their bills. That number probably closely approximates the percentage who think the economy isn't doing well. This is a different situation from people wrongly believing crime rates are high.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only rich people and corporations are doing well.

EVERYONE ELSE is in a fucking recession...

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Read your own source, it is a year old, and 51% said the economy was getting worse. Only like 30% said it was good or excellent...

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How we measure the economy does not measure the financial stability of the masses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I really don't like that the sources on this article are missing.

Sure, that’s a lot of money for the wealthy who control 93% of stock, but it’s also tens of millions of Americans who will have a more comfortable and secure retirement. In fact, the number of Americans who have over $1 million in their retirement accounts grew by 20% in the last quarter of 2023.

Fine and dandy, except that half of Americans don't have a retirement account. Or 47% of Americans.

So while retirement indexes are up, 1:2 people are not going to see that.

Inflation eased slightly in April — the first time this year that has happened. Overall inflation edged down to 3.4% and slipped to 3.6% when you exclude food and energy costs. (food expected to rise by an additional 2.2%)

Good to see the brakes are working. But just remember that not everyone goes out to by a car or house on a twice-a-week basis. But everyone does with the grocery store. Which in Biden's defense, he has started trying to pull back.

Though effort =/= job done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Why can’t we Manufacture Consent?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because everyone except the wealthy are struggling to pay their bills bootlicker

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Instead of complaining about the obvious disconnect between metrics and real world, often regional CoL, etc etc (oh and cost of medical care). Here's a simple solution:

Raise federal minimum wage, it's been a good decade and a bit since it went up from $5/h, the dollar has only inflated oh about 45% since 2009

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

How many billions did Kroger make this quarter????

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

I'll believe it when I stop getting only rejection letters for entry level jobs.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I share their opinion but also wish more people would care about metrics other than gdp and stock market indexes when a Republican is in office.

The news babbles about the real economy and how we're on the brink of a recession tirelessly whenever a Democrat is in the presidency, then magically when a Republican is even just elected (not even in office yet) all of those "meaningless" numbers are suddenly meaningful, and it turns out there's actually nothing wrong with using unemployment numbers, the GDP, and the Dow Jones index to determine economic health, even as more go homeless.

The only well-known politician I've seen talk consistently about this regardless of the party in the white house is Bernie.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (13 children)

They're asking the wrong question. The question should be who the economy is thriving for? The answer to that question will tell you everything you need to know.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

s/the economy/rich people's money/i

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The economy is doing good for what the president can do.

But the old metrics are not good. It used to just be employment rate that mattered, you know if people were employed that was sufficient. Now it's wages that have not kept up and it's a big issue.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 11 months ago

The economy means rich peoples yaght money.

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

No one can undo years of economic turbulence in three years. Everyone feels like they're being gaslit because they are. The patient will bleed out before you finish applying the first bandaid.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

The economy isn't thriving under Biden - it's doing alright. The stock market is thriving but workers are being muscled out of purchasing power.

load more comments