this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
347 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22705 readers
3315 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This brings the total under this administration to $167 Billion in relief for 4.75 million borrowers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

But but but Biden isn't doing anything!1!

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (3 children)

JOR BIDEN GENERCIDEs SO I VOET 3rd Party BRO IM COMMUNISM

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (8 children)

JOR BIDEN GENERCIDEs

Belittling opposition to genocide. Great look

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s not belittling genocide opposition. It’s belittling those who hold democracy ransom over a single issue that they don’t understand, and weren’t even aware was happening for the last several decades.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Hypocritical when it's you holding democracy ransom telling them who to vote for. I am expressing democracy by voting for Jill Stein.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (47 children)

You’re knowingly throwing away a vote. There’s not much left that is more anti-democracy. But for now- you can enjoy that right.

load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s not belittling genocide opposition.

It's absolutely nothing but.

over a single issue that they don’t understand

Yes, opposition to genocide is just because those who oppose it are unenlightened, not because it's fucking genocide.

and weren’t even aware was happening for the last several decades.

Biden hasn't been selling weapons he knows will be used for genocide for the past several decades. Now do the thing where you sling gaslighting and abuse.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For someone who had nothing to say about Palestine before October 7th, you sure love talking down at others from that high horse.

Your comment is history is almost entirety anti Biden rhetoric, and snarky rebuttals. People have tried to reason with you. You seem to have no desire to debate in good faith at all, so you should understand that It raises questions as to your motive here.

You have not, and will not find a single person here who supports genocide. Not one. Nor will you find anyone that thinks Biden handling of Palestine to be acceptable in any way. So STOP accusing people of this nonsense.

It makes you look foolish.

What people have CONSTANTLY tried to explain to you- is that this situation is very complicated. It’s nuanced. It’s not so simple to demand that something you don’t like be stopped immediately.

Either make an attempt to debate in good faith or don’t debate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

For someone who had nothing to say about Palestine before October 7th, you sure love talking down at others from that high horse.

Do you suppose that there might have been something that happened between then and now that might have made the genocide undeniable to all but a few bad faith actors?

Your comment is history is almost entirety anti Biden rhetoric

I have been massively dissatisfied with his performance, with one notable exception: he exceeded my expectations on student loan forgiveness.

You seem to have no desire to debate in good faith at all, so you should understand that It raises questions as to your motive here.

The accusations began the very first time I said that Biden should stop supporting genocide.

You have not, and will not find a single person here who supports genocide.

At the very least, genocide denial in the face of obvious genocide is support for genocide. Yes, I have encountered that right here on lemmy.

Nor will you find anyone that thinks Biden handling of Palestine to be acceptable in any way.

Seen that too. And not just from the deniers. Mostly it takes the form of "every president since the formation of Israel has been complicit, why start having a problem now?" Sometimes it's "we can't stop selling Netanyahu weapons because Republicans will call us antisemitic." Both are defenses of Biden's actions themselves, and not merely an admonition to vote for Biden on the grounds that Trump is undeniably worse.

Of course Trump is worse, and that's why I'm voting for Biden. But as long as Biden supports genocide, I'm going to say he should stop doing that.

It’s not so simple to demand that something you don’t like be stopped immediately.

I'm not going to ask for patient incrementalism over the course of decades here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Okay buddy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not really clear why. Biden has ran a competent administration and it's been like night and day compared to the chaotic horror of the trump admin. Of course, Biden should absolutely be pressured to change policy on Israel. AIPAC is a very powerful force in US politics, however. This is likely to be a close election and talking endless shit about Biden and encouraging people from voting or encouraging them to vote 3rd party absolutely is a gift to Trump. Netanyahu would love for Trump to be elected, as would Putin. It would be a greenlight for them to be even worse in their respective wars. Denigrating Biden and eroding his support will not solve anything for Palestine, and will totally screw Ukraine and Americans.

Quite obviously, I oppose genocide, and the Palestinians have deserved much better for years. Throwing this election over that issue makes absolutely no sense, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (7 children)

You could just ask me, I guess. Am I belittling genocide opposition? No. What I am opposed to is blaming the entire thing on Biden, as if 95% of the rest of the political establishment isn't involved and wouldn't have done the same things or worse. "Genocide Joe" is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. People seem totally ready to throw this election to trump, who has made it clear he would be even worse about Palestine, over this single issue, which would fuck over the US in an almost incalculable way. And then, it sure is odd how people who consider themselves leftists or communists spend huge amounts of time and energy bashing Biden and Democrats and NEVER express any concerns about Republicans or Trump. It makes absolutely no sense given that Democratic administrations are much better on issues they claim to care about - clean energy, unions, environmental regulations, women's rights, appointing reasonable people to courts, and so on.

Biden hasn’t been selling weapons he knows will be used for genocide for the past several decades.

The US just started supporting Israel with weapons and finances? Huh, I could have sworn that's been going on for at least 50 years.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The victimization from you is insane.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You're right. Genocide is victimless.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (5 children)

In this equation, you are playing victim by painting yourself as "opposition to genocide." When called on this, you pivoted to pretend the poster was insulting victims of genocide

I wanted to tell you that kind of cheap pivoting technique doesn't work here. I'm entirely against genocide and stand with Palestine, but this grandstanding is intellectually dishonest and makes you look like an entire clown.

I won't be replying further on this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I find it very amusing that you compared them to an entire clown and not some fractional amount of clown

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Never said that. I'm describing you.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (50 children)

Average American misunderstanding presidential power.

load more comments (50 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I don't know if I ever laughed so hard at a comment on Lemmy before. You nailed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Compared to the $1.7 trillion student loan debt crisis he was key in creating? Actually yes. When it comes to future students who have to take on massive amounts of debt, he's also doing nothing there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He hasn't done everything, everywhere, all at once, remaking all of society, in one fell swoop!1! Why won't he!1!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Relieving literally 10% of that debt during his presidency so far is pretty frickin big

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He really finds lovely configurations for the deck chairs on the Titanic.

These payments are flashy, but do nothing to remedy the current predatory student loan system or the rising costs of academia.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Or how I'd put it: One needs to apply first aid when dealing with a gun shot wound. You don't just try to dig the bullet out while still on the sidewalk. Pressure, call for help, get a bunch of people involved, then you can deal with the problem in a better way.

It's steps in the right direction that I'd hope will put on closer to having a higher education system closer to the majority of the EU.

Unfortunately we have to get passed the GQP first before we can get to that point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

He hasn’t solved climate change either, smh.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Centrists didn't want him to relieve student debt. Pretended his hands were tied. Said that we shouldn't try it on the grounds that it was an incomplete solution. Were content to abandon incrementalism entirely and let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

Then Biden started forgiving student debt. Then the Supreme Court ruled in centrists' favor. Biden could have announced that he tried and abandoned it forever with some vague insincere horseshit about the fight not being over. To Biden's immense credit, he had a contingency plan ready to go. He has kept forgiving debt. It's been the high point of his presidency. He did exactly what I hoped he would do on this issue and this issue alone. He listened to progressives and ignored centrists, and he persevered instead of immediately giving up forever when he encountered the first setback. He did what he could with the tools at his disposal instead of pretending they don't exist.

I will not fault him on this. If only he acted this way about any other issue.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Centrists?

Most polling shows that student debt relief is highly popular, a boring centrist Democrat has been leading the charge for it, and centrist judges have been voting in favor of it.

It’s the extreme right that been pushing back against debt relief. The center of America wants it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Centrists?

Yes. Centrists opposed it. I remember arguing with them about it. I listed some but not all of their arguments. Another one was that his hands were tied and he needed congress to pass it, with the standard addendum that progressives don't know how anything works. I remember pointing out that Chuck Schumer was asking for the same forgiveness that progressives were, and asking if Schumer didn't know how the Senate works. Yes, centrists opposed debt relief.

Biden listened to progressives. Biden persevered and didn't make stupid excuses.

Now centrists see that it's popular and want to take credit for progressive policy they opposed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The broad fast debt relief that Biden wanted WOULD require Congress. That is a fact.

That said, the day the court struck down the broader plan, Biden announced he would be moving forward on slower tactical ways of working within other laws and programs that would be much harder to combat in court. Many were worried that this approach, sans new bipartisan legislation, would not cover as many people. That is likely true.

If someone was arguing with you that Biden could do nothing, then they clearly didn’t listen to Biden, because he gathered the press that afternoon and outlined a plan that he has been executing for the past 11 months.

Today, the Supreme Court sided with them.  I believe the Court’s decision to strike down my student debt relief program was a mistake, was wrong. 

I’m not going to stop fighting to deliver borrowers what they need, particularly those at the bottom end of the economic scale.  So, we need to find a new way.  And we’re moving as fast as we can.

First, I’m announcing today a new path consistent with today’s ruling to provide student debt relief to as many borrowers as possible as quickly as possible. 

We will ground this new approach in a different law than my original plan, the so-called Higher Education Act.  That — that will allow Secretary Cardona, who is with me today, to compromise, waive, or release loans under certain circumstances. 

This new path is legally sound.  It’s going to take longer, but, in my view, it’s the best path that remains to providing for as many borrowers as possible with debt relief. 

I’ve directed my team to move as quickly as possible under the law.  Just moments ago, Secretary Cardona took the first step to initially that — to initiate that new approach. 

We’re not going to waste any time on this.  We’re getting moving on it.  It’s going to take longer, but we’re getting at it right away.

Second, we know what many borrowers will need to make their hard choices, which their — which their budgets are being strained now — when they start to repay their monthly loan payments this fall. 

You know, we know that figuring out how to pay these added expenses can take time for borrowers, and they might miss payments at the front end as they get back into repayment.

Normally, this could lead some borrowers to fall into delinquency and default.  But without their financial se- — it would hurt their financial security, and that’s not good for them or the economy.  That’s why we’re creating a temporary, 12-month what we’re calling “on-ramp” repayment program. 

Now, this is not the same as the student loan pause that’s been in effect for the past three years.  Monthly payments will be due, bills will ~~not~~ go out, and interest will be accruing.  And during this period, if you can pay your monthly bills, you should. 

But if you cannot, if you miss payments, this “on-ramp” will temporarily remove the threat of default or having your credit harmed, which can hurt borrowers for years to come, because the Department of Education won’t refer borrowers.  And the reason why that will work: They won’t refer borrowers who have missed payments to credit agencies for 12 months to give them a chance to get back up and running.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/06/30/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-supreme-courts-decision-on-the-administrations-student-debt-relief-program/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Love to see it. You know that every month until now until the election there will be more. Can't wait

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

lol if trump wins after this, this is never happening again

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

ITT: people who largely agree arguing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My favorite thing is when someone on the left uses "centrist" to label others on the left they disagree with. You see the right doing this all the time with "RINO".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Straight up no-true-Scotsman-ing it up in here

I've had people getting pissed at me in some comment sections calling me a centrist because I think we should vote for Biden to keep trump out of office. Nothing at all related to my political views other than telling people that they need to vote (which is apparently another cardinal sin to some "leftist") if they want to change happen in this country. Especially in their local governments.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Im pretty certain those are right-wing trolls here to convince people to not vote. They show up every election year.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

The repub party will be like oh noez, that is so unlegal!

load more comments
view more: next ›