this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38500 readers
1 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's everything we know about it so far:

  • It will use ActivityPub.
  • It will be a side app of Instagram.
  • It will most likely be called Threads.
  • Your Instagram verification status will transfer over.
  • There will be easy discovery tools in place: Your Instagram followers will be able to follow you on Threads as well (they won't transfer over automatically).

What do you think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antony@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I don't want corporate social networks who farm data.

[–] jimmyjoners@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't want corporate social media full stop. As soon as there is a profit motive things will always slowly decay.

I just hope it's viable to survive on grants/donors a la Wikipedia. Add some "awards" like on reddit, and that should help as well.

[–] antony@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Aye, but these things need running like a business. They are too expensive and too complicated, they need oversight, planning, and proper governance if they aren't single user personal instances. Opencollective seems to work well for Mastodon for funding and might work for Lemmy too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It will use activity pub....... until it gets adoption and then it will close the doors like they did with XMPP. Also its Facebook so anything they touch should be avoided like the plague. They have proven time and time again they are not to be trusted, they were in the Snowden docs & they have had numerous lawsuits against them.

https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/10/31/20940532/edward-snowden-facebook-nsa-whistleblower

"and if you don't know , now you know"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DiamondOptics@partizle.com 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Meta has the capacity to make really evil products, let's not start the EEE treadmill.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sascamooch@lemmy.sascamooch.com 20 points 2 years ago
[–] binwiederhier@discuss.ntfy.sh 16 points 2 years ago

I know this is not the right audience for this, but that is an exceptional move on Meta's side, and the timing is perfect. Meta has produced so much garbage with the metaverse and all that stuff, so this seems like the first good idea they had in a while.

[–] EnigmaNL@feddit.nl 16 points 2 years ago

I hate Meta even more than Twitter, so no.

[–] Butterbee@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago

Not. A. Chance. I will also encourage my mastodon instance to not federate with them.

[–] SillyLilJester@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, I don't thrive in person-oriented media, I'm only ok with topic-oriented media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] imkmiaw@lemmy.fmhy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't want anything else related to Meta...

I stopped using Fb years ago and had to use it again not long ago because I moved countries and the demographic here can't stop using Fb/Instagram/Whatsapp for everything related to business.

But if it uses ActivityPub (and from my understanding that's decentralized), couldn't I just use my Mastodon account to interact with people there? Would that mean that my Instagram (or, in this case, "Threads") account can potentially communicate with Mastodon accs as well?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noonecanknowitsme@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago
[–] SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at 14 points 2 years ago

Not likely in the slightest.

[–] matt@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There's no way I'll actually use the platform, but I personally have no qualms with federating with it on my instances so I can communicate with friends who may be using it that haven't made the jump to the current fediverse.

Whether we like it or not, this is most likely the best chance for regular people to be introduced to the Fediverse and hopefully gain a good understanding of it, providing that Meta doesn't hide it from people too much or make it complicated enough that people are "encouraged" to use their platform instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Nope. Meta is a blight on the world. Musk, Huffman should buy Meta and start a competition on who can make it circle the drain faster.

[–] Poot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

The idea of getting involved with any kind of corporate media at this point turn to my stomach, especially after all this happened in the last couple years.

Why in God's name would anybody invest any time and energy into yet another corporate platform that will just be yanked, or turned into a nightmare when some corporate man baby decides he hasn't had enough profits to keep himself in new yachts.

I'm sick of it, have absolutely no intention whatsoever of participating in that crap anymore.

[–] jhoward@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago

No. What's the Web 2.0 version of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. Because that. Oh, and because that company is toxic waste. No, worse that that. At least toxic waste comes with the promise that enough work would leave it inert.

[–] leraje@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Meta Plan:

  1. We're going to use ActivityPub because we love the Fediverse!!!
  2. Now we're live, here's some improvements to AP, now they're not standard but we're working closely with the AP guys. It would help if you all pleaded with them to accept these changes- they're just to make things better!
  3. Yay! All the changes were implemented and we've formed the AP Council, we might invite some of the old AP guys to it.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spdrmx@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago

Good thing about it is that since it will use ActivityPub, all fediverse instances can restrict it and they'll lose a big chunk of possible content.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

Nope I'm done with corporate-controlled social media.

[–] Sintamo@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

I genuinely believe this could be successful.

Mastodon STILL has UX issues, and the rest of ActivityHub and the Fediverse are impenetrable to the average person. That will change over time, but in the meantime, I can't even get people to use Signal for god's sake, let alone explain which Lemmy instance is best for them.

I still have an Instagram because my friends do. Without Instagram DMs and iMessage, I lose real life connections. If they fold in a Twitter-esque client to Instagram, that I can interact with from Mastodon if I want? That sounds like a really strong value proposition to me, and is the only way your non-techy friends are joining this parade any time soon.

But also, we've got to make sure these massive companies don't snuff out what Lemmy and Mastodon are building. There's a group of suits somewhere right now thinking of how to monetise this platform, and we need to be prepared for that.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Aldo@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UWbadgers16@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[–] thegiddystitcher@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Coming at this from a slightly different angle, as I do use Instagram and it was responsible for helping my YT channel and therefore my business in general take off.

I'm already on Mastodon, so would have no need to use this. However, I've really come to despise IG and find interacting with it to be more of a chore than anything. So an option for my friends and viewers from IG to communicate with me without me having to actually log in over there? I can just stay on Mastodon and run everything from one place? Sounds fine to me!

(pending evidence of good faith as discussed elsewhere in thread)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OrthoStice@feddit.it 9 points 2 years ago

Hello no. Fuck Meta and fuck Mark Zuckerberg.

[–] legion@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Hard pass. The only reason I use Meta at all is because they acquired Instagram, and I'm barely on there as it is (but my family members are).

[–] Marko@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How many social network do they need to have?

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

All of them

[–] NexNecis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

I think I'm done with corporate social media.

[–] Artanis@feddit.it 8 points 2 years ago

Absolutely not. It's Meta, why would I touch anything Meta? :)

[–] open_world@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

If given a choice between Mastodon (with all its flaws) and anything by Meta, I would always choose Mastodon.

[–] Tony_Pepperoni@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

Join anything from Meta? Hell naw!

Plus, it will be integrated with Instagram? Even further hell naw!

[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I will stick with Mastodon

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teflocarbon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Over my dead body. I'd never trust a single thing from Meta. Their track record is absolutely horrific in every way possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melody@lemmy.one 8 points 2 years ago

Hard No.

In fact I'd expect a large number of fediverse instances to defederate or silence the instance so that users who do not want to be bothered by it will not be bothered.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unpopular opinion: yeah, probably. Facebook and Instagram have come a long way in tackling misinformation and hate speech since 2016. Obviously they aren't perfect, but now that Twitter is pushing that shit into my recommendations I want updates from my feed without having to support Twitter.

That being said I've never interacted with Twitter much, only used it for updates, so it's not like Meta will get anything from my limited personal data.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JC1@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

The main thing I dislike is that it will use the name Threads. Finding info on Thread, the network protocol for home automation devices, will be much harder. Might be niche, but annoying.

[–] Mr_Grumpy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

A snowball has a better chance of surviving in hell than me joining anything Meta.

[–] Laconic@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago
[–] ellabella@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It sounds like nobody will, but Instagram influencers are actually a different kind of population, it's actually rather clever of meta to transfer the verification status. We wont be just talking about influencers but also athletes and celebrities.

Personally I wouldnt open an account, but I wouldn't be surprised if these celebrity followers will create one for the fomo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreyCat134@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

No, but it will be funny to watch Elon’s reaction when it launches.

[–] Mindless_Enigma@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's neat to see them using ActivityPub, but I'm really wary of anything created under the Meta/Facebook umbrella. We'll have to wait and see if they decide to act in good faith with this which my biases make me doubtful they will.

Also, if they're using ActivityPub, why would I have to join if I can just loop in with my existing Mastodon account?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] harbo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

No thanks, I’ll stick with mastodon. But if Meta’s version is enabled on the fediverse then I welcome it

[–] primaryuser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

No.

Easiest question of my life.

[–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's probably a good idea to limit/defederate with this when it shows up, as it's a vector for EEE and Meta will be doing the usual data collection shit they do with their users, but now with Fediverse users as well. They just got hit with a big fine for violating the GDPR.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uzay@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope they get defederated immediately. There's not much more Facebook can do to prove they are a bad faith actor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VindianaJones@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

I can't trust big tech to do anything remotely good anymore, after what's happened with... well, basically every single social media platform owned by them. I'm sure I'll take a peek at it but I haven't touched Facebook or Instagram in years for several reasons, so I really don't want to give Meta any more of my attention.

load more comments