this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
677 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22749 readers
3130 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

that's the problem, it's Sanders' bid. It should be unanimously the democrats bid, but Sanders is fighting against them too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Except for all the ones he isn't... Because there is more than two parties in our two party system.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Yeah. I’d like it if we could define the 4 ish parties better. Instead of having two wolves allowed to tear the place up.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Yeah but they won't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The US should block all sales of arms to other counties.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Russia would have completely invaded Ukraine if the US were isolationist and had a weak military. Countries with imperial ambitions like Russia and China don't just go away because the US stops military support to other countries.

The US needs leadership that will use their military deterrence for good, not to stop supporting other democratic countries or get rid of their military. We need to keep zionists and the fascists out of office.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck does China have imperial ambitions?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

As someone who lives in the U.S. but has never lived in a county, I agree. Only I should get fighter jets and billions of dollars in free money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You've never lived in a county? Where in the US can you live without living in a county, unincorporated towns maybe?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Louisiana and DC don’t have counties.

Edit: Alaska too, apparently. But I’ve never been there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

A parish IS a county.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Really? That's odd. But they probably have something similar right?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Louisiana uses “Parishes” and they’re functionally equivalent. It’s based on French and Spanish rule where Catholic Church boundaries were drawn.

DC doesn’t have counties (or congressional representation) because it’s geographically small and also a territory, not a state. (Though it’s got more people than Wyoming or Vermont, everyone pays federal taxes, etc. so it really should have Representatives and Senators if “no taxation without representation” means anything.)

As I understand it, Alaska has “boroughs” near cities that sort of serve a similar function but much of the state is (or was) largely unpopulated so there will be a borough in the core settlement that acts like a county. Then, there’s lots of private, federal, and state lands that aren’t really inhabited and aren’t governed by the borough anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Very interesting thank you for explaining!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Or, don’t build fighter jets 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Us economy is driven by the military industrial complex. Taxpayer funded defense "aid" is given to countries, only for them to turn around and buy american weapons with said aid, thus funneling the money into private pockets. Legislature "pork" was/is notorious for kickbacks to local manufacturing plants for various military equipment. The entire scheme of "global defense" that the US has pushed over the last 70 years has been driven by the desire to monopolize military production and sales on a global scale. Sanctions are imposed on countries which otherwise agree ideologically with what the US professes are its ideals because those countries purchase arms from the US competitors, while notably hostile countries like Saudia Arabia are propped up bc they are good for business. Israel aid is given to be spent on US arms. The US doesn't give a shit how countries use their arms, as long as they're buying. Without the military industrial complex, much of the domestic economy would likewise grind to a halt. Hell, the US military is the biggest domestic employer. The system is simply not set up for a massive paradigm shift like that, though imo it's going to have to happen eventually because the current, unsustainable system is reaching it's last leg and starting to topple over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Aren't arms shipments written into law? Can they override the Republicans?