Good for Kamala.
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
543 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22232 readers
3583 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Good for America.
you fucking morons
You don't need to restore Roe.
You need an actual law enshrining it as a right.
I'm not a judge, but I can definitely see why Roe was overturned. So don't play stupid games, don't rely on a Court to interpret a certain Law a certain way, just enshrine it in law. Black ink on white paper.
Oh of course, we'll just go ahead and do that tomorrow! Sheesh, what were we thinking? Thank you so much for your enlightening remarks. It was so obvious this entire time!
Politico Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Politico is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F07%2F29%2Fkamala-harris-abortion-restoring-roe-00171657
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Footer
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
Rather just restore, improve. It was said Roe is incomplete and should be revisited for better and clearer coverage.
So why hasn’t Biden?
Kind of tough when Republicans are in charge of the house of representatives.
Last I checked, the house of representatives doesn't keep him from speaking out and pushing the issue.
I know you're a troll, but just in case someone well meaning stumbles across this, Biden has called for this so many times.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2024/
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-06-27/trump-biden-abortion-presidential-debate
This took about three minutes to find, all from 2024.
He is also literally speaking on it this very moment, as I type this, in a speech marking the anniversary of the civil rights movement.
I never made any claim that he wasn't pushing the issues, but cool. I was merely rebutting the reply above mine.
Maybe don't defend someone implying that he's not pushing the issue next time.
So why hasn't Biden?
.
Last I checked, the house of representatives doesn't keep him from speaking out and pushing the issue.
This you?
I never made any claim that he wasn't pushing the issues
This too?
Actually NO! That "So why hasn't Biden" IS NOT ME...
For fucks sake. Can you people get a grip? Read the damn user names.
And the second and third quotes, that were you?
Take the goddamn L, man. You made a statement in ignorance, you were wrong, and you were given evidence showing you were wrong. Accept it, learn from your mistake, and be better in the future.
My comment was about restoring Roe and you said there's nothing stopping him from speaking out about it. Which he is doing. So I'm not really sure what you were rebutting.
I was rebutting the reply saying that The House of Representatives was stopping him from speaking about it...holy crap can you guys not follow a comment thread correctly or something? I'm literally saying the same thing you are, but because some numb-nuts didn't check the names in the threads and called me a troll I get dogpiled?
You people are what's wrong with Lemmy.
You might want to try following the thread a little better if that's what you think is happening here.
I'm the person you originally responded to. I said Biden hasn't restored Roe because of the house. I though it would be clear from context since he is speaking about it.
If everyone misunderstood you then maybe the problem isn't with them.
If that is what you were trying to say you expressed yourself poorly. It's possible to clarify your position without ranting at other people for your mistake.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Don't worry too much about it. You're being dogpiled because that's what lemmy's centrists do when they encounter someone who isn't cheering loudly enough for Biden.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Last I checked, being either disingenuous or a moron doesn't prevent you from using Google to look up whether or not Biden failire in calling for the restoration of roe you're implying is true.
I mean It's not like I'm claiming you're a disingenuousmoron who can't use Google, right?
Funny how that works
Alright, then you strongly implied Biden doesn't speak out about that. There's been many people on abortion related threads who falsely say or imply that, and I don't know any other way someone could reasonably read your comment. It's still there to place an edit afterwards if you'd like to clarify what you meant exactly.
I didn't imply anything, the guy I replied to did! And here you are all jumping my ass about it. I don't need to edit shit; you need to stop jumping to conclusions.
never made any claim that he wasn’t pushing the issues,
So why hasn’t Biden?
lol
To be fair, that was a different person.
load more comments
(2 replies)
In March:
Tonight, President Biden will again call on Congress to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade in federal law so women in every state have the freedom to make deeply personal health care decisions. And the Biden-Harris Administration will continue to take executive action to protect access to reproductive health care, including through ongoing implementation of the President’s three Executive Orders and a Presidential Memorandum issued since the Court overturned Roe v. Wade. To date, the Administration has taken action to:
- Protect access to abortion, including FDA-approved medication abortion;
- Defend access to emergency medical care;
- Support the ability to travel for reproductive health care;
- Strengthen access to high-quality, affordable contraception;
- Safeguard the privacy of patients and health care providers; and
- Ensure access to accurate information and legal resources.
load more comments
(2 replies)
biden's not running LOL
Don't restore it, make a better law and make it a human right.
How would "restoring" work? Is that legislation, or modifying the supreme court, etc?
Basically legislation. Dobbs just said there wasn’t a constitutional right, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be a federal law that makes that a right. A federal law could effectively restore this right (although it wouldn’t make it a constitutional right, which would be harder to take away).
Another mythical carrot to lure voters to the polls, again. I cant imagine people falling for this lie, again.
oh, are we using "number of lies told" as a metric to judge? ok, here
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
Don't feed the troll.
Not much for trolls to eat from that link though, bro is murdered
Deflecting and burying your head in the sand doesn't get rid of the fact that Democrats have promised time and again to protect rights when in reality they've weaponized them so they can raise campaign money.
LOL harris will have the biggest inauguration crowd ever
Still deflecting
Nobody deflects quite like a right-wing hate-fueled empathy-lacking doublethinker
You are closer in ideology to Republicans than any leftist is to Democrats.
"I don't believe Kamala actually wants to restore Roe v Wade, so I'm going to support the party that took it away in the first place!"
Makes sense to me!
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
view more: next ›