this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
276 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The media is mainly sensationalist driven and Trump is... well he's very not normal.

Unless we fix media funding and restore something like the fairness act loud assholes will always have an advantage.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hate it. The last 9 years have been hell for me because this asshole won't shut up and the news insists on blasting every stupid thing he says. It doesn't matter if he thinks drinking bleach is a good idea. What matters is the news broadcasts this so people that already know he's an idiot can laugh, and those that don't think 'well if der president says it makes sense it must'. What you get is 1. a decrease in average intelligence, and 2. constant name recognition for a rapist felon with no business acumen who chronically lies and wants to literally destroy democracy.

Graph go up tho so hurr hurr!

edit: typos

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

The problem as I see it is how the news portrays every little thing the left does (or just things that happen on the left's watch) with the exact same sensationalism as every radical thing the right does and says. If anything they tone down what the right does so it doesn't sound extreme.

Like finding the most extreme loud leftist protester to compare to actual elected delegates on the right or militant groups on the right that officials actually back. Meanwhile if the right wipes their ass without making a mess, they are hailed.

The left is judged on their worst and the right is judged onto their best, and the left still usually comes out looking better.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The Fairness Act had its own problems and the GQP used to be masters at wielding it to get fringe ideas/pundits on otherwise reasonable media platforms. It was only when non-conservative voices started saying “this cuts both ways” and elbowing their way onto conservative-dominated AM radio and rising shows on Fox that republicans tore it down.

This wasn’t a healthy media landscape and it contributed very heavily to the erroneous idea that there are always two equally valid sides which has morphed into “both sides.”

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

stupid thing he says. I doesn’t matter if he things drinking bleach is a good idea. What matters is

It wasn't perfect, but it was WAY better than what we have now. They just lie openly about anything they want with zero oversight.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

The Fairness Doctrine is a red herring in the conversation either way. Even if it hadn't been rescinded, it would have eventually become irrelevant.

The Fairness Doctrine only ever applied to radio and TV broadcasters, i.e., broadcasters operating using the limited, publicly owned radio spectrum. It was only Constitutionally enforceable because it was intended to ensure equal access to what was essentially a public space.

Cable TV and the Internet turned that completely on its head. Attempting to regulate speech over a privately owned medium is a very, very different legal hill to climb. The most problematic sources of misinformation and bias today tend not to be AM radio but things like NewsMax or Libsoftiktok.

It's a huge problem, but it's not one the Fairness Doctrine would solve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Fairness doctrine wouldn’t stop this

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Billionaire owners of the media HATE paying taxes

Trump’s tax plan ensures they pay zero taxes while crushing the working class.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

YUP! That's also why they need to be taxed harder.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

From a different post but I think it works here too:

I think the error is calling these people journalist. They are not. They are content creators.

Their job isn’t to get to the truth, it’s to drive clicks and comments. It’s to enrich them and their employer.

There are good journalist still out there but since they don’t play to the almighty ALGORITHM they get drowned out.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

The NYT is going to be interviewing the last living Trump supporters in their final hours, fervently insisting they are the bellweathers of the 2048 election season.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

They treat him as if he's fucking normal. He's not! He's beyond weird.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The INTELLIGENCER

Reads like it was written by a 5th grader

Kekw

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My iPhone glitched in safari. Here’s the archive https://archive.ph/lZKy1

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Well don't go on safari and go on social media

Oh the browser? That still exists?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

New York Magazine - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Magazine:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/medias-bias-kamala-harris-donald-trump-double-standard.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support