this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

3705 readers
2302 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

Remember the sacred texts:

You all are making me work too hard, so I'm locking this dumpster fire and drinking my coffee.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (12 children)

Oh so baity!

You can remove "western democracy" there I guess.

Also nah, I can speak out against my boss, my eventual landlord and protest in the streets, because I live in France, a western democracy.

YMMW.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

And yet most of the political forces in France are advocating to remove all these rights. Sindicalists are arrested under terrorist laws, as are eco-activists. And maires trying to enforce price ceiling for lawns in cities are considered like Staline.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

The French are smart enough to burn cars and loot when their government tries to pull some bullshit. I wish Germans were that smart.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I bet OP hasn't actually done any of the things they listed. Reads like an edgy teenager.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Imagine being unironically anti-democracy and also claiming to be a socialist.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Anarchist types prefer consensus-based decision making processes to democracy. We want the entire community to agree on a course of action, not just let 51% order 49% around.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are we talking about American Democracy, where the police have carte blanche to brutalize protesters for objecting to police brutality and a SCOTUS majority can overturn a popular election?

Or Chinese Democracy where you can be in any party you want, but only the CCP gets to hold any real power? Or the Taiwanese Parliament, where politicians form gangs that attempt to beat up each other's members?

Or Thai Democracy, where the courts are selected by the King and regularly disband majority governments for committing Lese Majesty?

Are we talking about Apartheid Israeli Democracy, where over half the population is disenfranchised for being Palestinian?

How about Iranian Democracy, where the Supreme Council gets to decide who can run for office?

Do we like the Brazilian style of Democracy, where an elected Prime Minister can be deposed by the AG and a fascist can fuck around massacring indigenous people for a Presidential term, while the former PM gets the charges dropped and has to run for his old seat?

Are we big fans of the DPRK, where a single family has dominated the federal government since the country's founding? Or are we more inclined towards the Republic of Korea, which continues to send up the children and friends of the old 1970s Dictatorship to run the country, because 90% of the economy is controlled by six billionaire families?

Like, you can't just say "anti-democracy". Cuba claims to be a democracy. Argentina claims to be a democracy. The UK claims to be a democracy. Russia claims to be a democracy. What kind of democracy are we actually against?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to fix things I'm all for it, but lets not pretend that the notion of "Western Democracies" being responsible for their problems has any merit whatsoever.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

lets not pretend that the notion of “Western Democracies” being responsible for their problems has any merit whatsoever.

The problems tend to be anti-democratic in nature. The cozy relationship between mass media and corporate interests restricts information to the voting public. Privatization of public spaces forces candidates to raise enormous amounts of money just to secure space to host a rally or get a minute of TV coverage. And the legal means by which private party leadership can restrict access to a primary, combined with the broader public limits on who can participate in an election as an independent, help dictate the quality of candidates that voters have to choose from.

"Western Democracy" has always consisted, first and foremost, as a bunch of backroom deals and handshake arrangements. JD Vance didn't get the VP slot under Trump because he was the second most popular Republican in the primaries. Neither Mike Johnson nor Nancy Pelosi became Speaker of the House because they were the nation's most beloved Congressfolks. Nobody on the current Supreme Court cares what the electorate thinks of them. None of this is small-d democratic. And all of it contributes to the basket of problems that plague our dysfunctional domestic policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

For the first 2 points: Don't use "Western democracies". This is a US problem. Canada has much stronger labour and home protections.

3rd point: Getting banned online is a "you" problem. Your government has nothing to do with why your shitty opinions get you banned or muted. The fact that you even have the ability to complain about your government online is a luxury many other governments don't afford to their people.

4th point: Whining about cereal variety makes the entire argument hold less water. Who the fuck cares about brands of cereal. Buy your cereal or don't, but shut the fuck up about it. This is an empty complaint about capitalism.

5th point: Fair enough.

I don't directly mean you, OP. Unless you made the meme... In which case I do mean directly you.

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I think cereal is brought in to demonstrate the absurdity of the situation, where something so basic as worker's or renter's rights are non-existent but somehow energy already has went into something so stupid as cereal, which indeed nobody cares about.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

First point is definetly a problem in other western democracies. In Sweden there is the "loyalty obligation", which states that you have to -- according to one of the centrist unions here -- "put the interest of the company above your own". It is a strong intrusion in your freedom of speech.

[–] OhShitSon@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which of the unions is that? Just so I know which one to avoid.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Unionen". I think they focus a lot on like engineers and bosses, and other upper middle class jobs.

I don't think the union is really to blame there, "loyalty obligation", lojalitetsplikt, is afaik a set of laws that really does what Unionen says about it. It's not the union implementing it.

To be frank, I think its quite a refreshingly honest phrasing they are using. A more company-friendly way would be like "we all like to be teamplayers, and that is what the loyalty obligation is all about", or something like that. Now it sounds like "you are the guy on the track in the trolly problem meme, get fucked", and to some degree, fair play to you.

[–] OhShitSon@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

From what I could read during my morning fugue state, it seems to me that they're warning you that the contract you signed when getting hired does not allow you to be disloyal to the company as long as you're working for it. I could not find anything about it being an actual law, though I've been wrong before so it wouldn't surprise me if I missed something.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Som anställd har du lojalitetsplikt gentemot arbetsgivaren – även under en uppsägningstid. Se upp så att du inte bryter mot LAS eller lagen om företagshemligheter.

Om du då är illojal, kan det betyda att du bryter mot LAS ( Lagen om anställningsskydd)

So it is a colloquial term for those aspects of LAS and lagen om företagshemligheter. Those quotes from Unionen again. There seems to be aspects (the application of this after your employment ends) also regulated in the collective bargening agreements, and those are not laws, that is true.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

More like: I am so happy I live in america.

Everywhere else you have job protection and renters protection

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago (8 children)

A lot of these comments reek of boot polish...

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tacofox@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago
load more comments