this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
363 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44380 readers
3899 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Three individuals targeted National Gallery paintings an hour after Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland were jailed for similar attack in 2022

Climate activists have thrown tomato soup over two Sunflowers paintings by Vincent van Gogh, just an hour after two others were jailed for a similar protest action in 2022.

Three supporters of Just Stop Oil walked into the National Gallery in London, where an exhibition of Van Gogh’s collected works is on display, at 2.30pm on Friday afternoon, and threw Heinz soup over Sunflowers 1889 and Sunflowers 1888.

The latter was the same work targeted by Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland in 2022. That pair are now among 25 supporters of Just Stop Oil in jail for climate protests.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 149 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (50 children)

So if throwing paint at a entierly replaceable cover for a dusty old painting is too far gone to be acceptable, what action can we take to stop oil production? Like. It needs to stop. To continue producing fossil fuels is a death cult. It needs to stop, like, a decade ago. I ask genuinely, how is this too far, and what is an acceptable response to an existential threat?

edit: On the off chance someone reads this so long after the post, I just want to point out that nobody actually engaged with my question here.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago (9 children)

So if throwing paint at a entierly replaceable cover for a dusty old painting is too far gone to be acceptable, what action can we take to stop oil production?

God, I wish someone could actually trace the train of events that would lead to reduced oil production from this other than some bizarre notion that throwing soup at a priceless artifact of human heritage will Energize The Masses(tm) or suddenly convince people who think climate change is a hoax or overblown that it's actually a serious problem.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (28 children)

Imagine if these activists spent more time going after companies benefiting from fossil fuel production rather than throwing soup in museums...

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago (20 children)

They've done that too, and have encountered media blackouts.

As nice as it would be if they could simply fix the climate problem with the disruption a handful of protests cause, they can't, and need to draw public attention to the problem.

These demonstrations open up the conversation in threads like this - you agree there's a problem, you agree these protests don't fix the problem, so let's talk about what will.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Seems to me that it would be pretty difficult to encounter a media blackout to do this sort of thing at, for example, global climate summits, oil company shareholder meetings, etc.

But I'm not seeing much soup being thrown there.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 5 months ago (9 children)

In Germany, protestors repeatedly shut oil pipelines off and locked themselves to the valves to prevent their reopening, blocking oil flow for several hours every time. I consume a lot of news, both mainstream and in my leftist bubble. That story barely registered anywhere.

The exact same protestors threw mashed potatoes at a Van Gogh. They were the main headline for over a week.

Hell, some guy set himself on fire a few years ago and it was in the news for half a day.

The media blackout is real, but it's not a huge conspiracy. It's just that the media reports on what gets them clicks, and nothing generates clicks like outrage. That's why so much reporting also conveniently forgets to mention that the paintings are protected by plexiglass and nothing ever got damaged. But all the controversy gets people talking, and some people will inevitably question what drives people to do something like that. That is the real objective. If they wanted to be popular, they'd to greenwashed recycling videos on YouTube instead, or whatever else is hip with the neoliberal peddlers of personal responsibility at the moment.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right? Go throw soup at Darren Woods or one of the oil execs, not at a painting

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)
[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 121 points 5 months ago (9 children)

While I think this was a stupid way to go about risking jail time for a noble cause, I would like to remind everybody here of what everybody in the 60s thought about MLK and his peaceful protests:

There never has nor will there ever be such a thing as "the right way to protest." The right way to protest means out of sight where it can be conveniently ignored.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Interesting that you think this is stupid, yet you acknowledge that protests are inherently uncomfortable.

People are talking about Just Stop Oil every time they pull one of these stunts. Sounds like they're accomplishing their goals will bells on.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I agree except that potential damage to historical pieces makes me extremely upset.

I would prefer they ACTUALLY riot to that.

... and, in fact, that would probably be much more effective.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

They tried protesting at oil infrastructure, they stopped multiple oil terminals in the UK being used for weeks and caused shortages in various parts of the UK. Hundreds went to prison and everyone forgot about it after a week.

They throw soup at glass, 2 people go to a police station for a few days and people are still talking about it months later.

Unfortunately, they have to exist within the constraints of modern news media, outrage cycles and social media, and that influences their decisions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kzhe@lemmy.zip 42 points 5 months ago

I mean JSO never actually tried to damage historical pieces. The paintings are behind glass

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 5 months ago (6 children)

To everyone in this thread who has nothing but insults for these activists, what are you doing against climate breakdown? Besides sitting on your couch, insulting people who are actually trying to make a difference, facing jail time?

You are the kind of people who would've called the Suffragettes names and said they're hurting the cause, as well.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 25 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Compared to what they've accomplished by getting some plexiglass wet, it seems like sitting on my couch has accomplished the same. Maybe more by staying home, unless they rode bikes or walked to do the deed.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (4 children)

No, no, you see, all attention is good attention, and attention is the most valuable thing to the climate change movement right now. That's the issue. Not enough people are AWARE that it's a THING. If they were, we would be making much more progress than we currently are.

/s

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 71 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  1. It was covered by glass, unclutch your fucking pearls already.

  2. Van Gogh is my favorite painter, and I would still rather have a habitable planet for future generations than have Sunflowers. If you're more mad about this than you are about what big oil and gas companies are doing, sit down and have a good hard think about where your priorities are. I do not give a shit if you "agree with their message but not their tactics" or if you "think it makes the cause look bad" or whatever other bullshit you want to spew to cover your ass right now. Ultimately, if this caused you to feel a greater sense of righteous anger than the wholesale destruction of our environment for profit does, you are part of the problem. I'd rather side with the people who are trying to make a difference, even if I don't like how they do it, than side with the people plundering our world for personal gain.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I see a lot of confusion and misinformation in the comments about what Just Stop Oils demands are. Their website makes it very plain and you can read through the details yourself. The press has massively misrepresented the groups demands and goals so its best to read it for yourself. https://juststopoil.org/

These are the 3 demands they have.

✅ Demand 1: No New Oil and Gas Licences – WON!

🔥 Demand 2: Just Stop Oil by 2030.

🧡 We need a Fossil Fuel Treaty.

  • Demand 1 they only just won when the UK government changed to Labour who have committed the first item, so all their previous actions were with the goal of not expanding yet further the use of fossil fuels.
  • Demand 2 is to phase the use of fossil fuels out by 2030. The UK has a net zero goal of 2035 so this would bring that goal earlier but many other countries have a 2030 target in the EU.
  • Demand 3 is all about trying to get a world wide treaty signed to stop the use of oil to try and meet the Paris agreement to keep within 1.5C.

There is no immediate demand to stop or anything so extreme, they are largely what the UK has already agreed to do but is failing to achieve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Just Stop Oil activists throw soup at ~~Van Gogh’s Sunflowers~~ plastic sheet after fellow protesters jailed

I dunno why these newspapers constantly print these phony headlines... Oh wait. It's the clickbait and propaganda obviously.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 21 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Is this a joke? They literally threw soup at the painting, but the painting was protected. And you're calling this click bait and propaganda? I've seen some pretty ridiculous whining about click bait, but this might now take the top spot.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] geogle@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That sort of comment could be used to justify an unbelievable amount of vandalism and terror and is just not productive

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 5 months ago (10 children)

We should value the Earth more than art. If vandalism of paintings bothers people more than the destruction of the Earth then they should reexamine their priorities. No to mention, the vandalism of the art is imagined, the painting is undamaged, but the damage to the planet is real. On top of that, if we do nothing to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions then the damage to the planet will continue to worsen.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago

There is literally no vandalism nor terrorism here apart from the planet being destroyed.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Hot take: I swear a lot of these kinds of "protests" are funded by the oil companies themsleves to make climate activists look like crazy crackpots easy for the media and average Joe to dismiss. Like with the Stonehenge paint bullshit. Really?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (4 children)

These pro-acrylic protests are getting out of hand!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Good for them.

They’re getting media attention for their message. That isn’t easy to do.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 months ago (14 children)

I know Lemmy has mixed feelings here, but I personally applaud these activists for risking prison time to draw attention to a major existential threat.

I find it quite entertaining to see all the art aficionados coming out so shook by them getting a little bit of soup onto some plexiglass and a picture frame that they probably couldn't even describe before these incidents. Close your eyes, Is it walnut or cherry? Painted or oil finished? Ornate or simple? 5 or 7 inches wide? Symmetrical or asymmetrical along a horizontal axis?

These protests, which thus far have involved basically zero actual damage of cultural significance have driven significantly more attention (good and bad) to their cause than anything else that has been done. Their protests are non-violent and generally nondestructive.

That said, the real crime here is the judge sentencing 2 years in prison for getting some soup on the frame of a painting - I don't support violent protests, but I'm pretty sure you could just go around and slap oil CEOs in the face for a fraction of the sentence.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)

“I chose to peacefully disrupt a business-as-usual system that is unjust, dishonest and murderous.”

Ah, yes, the murderous system of [checks notes] art made generations before you were born.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Stop_Oil

In April 2022, it was reported that Just Stop Oil's primary source of funding was donations from the US-based Climate Emergency Fund.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileen_Getty

Aileen Getty is an American heiress and activist. She is a member of the Getty family, the granddaughter of J. Paul Getty. She co-founded the Climate Emergency Fund in 2019.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Paul_Getty

Jean Paul Getty Sr. (/ˈɡɛti/; December 15, 1892 – June 6, 1976) was an American-born British petroleum industrialist who founded the Getty Oil Company in 1942 and was the patriarch of the Getty family.[1] A native of Minneapolis, he was the son of pioneer oilman George Getty. In 1957, Fortune magazine named him the wealthiest living American,[2] while the 1966 Guinness Book of Records declared him the world's wealthiest private citizen, worth an estimated $1.2 billion (approximately $8.6 billion in 2023).[3] At the time of his death, he was worth more than $6 billion (approximately $25 billion in 2023).[4] A book published in 1996 ranked him as the 67th wealthiest American who ever lived (based on his wealth as a percentage of the concurrent gross national product).[5]

So she assuages her guilt for having a huge oil inheritance by donating some of it to encourage other people overseas to go to jail protesting other people doing what her grandfather made his money doing. Great.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

What do you expect her to do instead?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (21 children)

Just Stop Oil has to be the most destructive and idiotic activist group I've ever heard of (besides Greenpeace and their anti-nuclear agenda). They make activism as a whole look bad with their pointless stunts.

What does Vincent van Gogh have to do with the current state of the petrol industry? What does any classical artist have to do with the current state of the petrol industry? Why go out of one's way to try and ruin something that isn't even remotely related to the subject? They're only making themselves look like a bad joke.

Doesnt help they're total assholes either; a few years ago they blocked a motorway in England in protest. Fair enough. But there was a family who's baby had to be rushed to the nearest hospital, and they weren't allowed to pass! Seriously, fuck them.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (12 children)

What does Vincent van Gogh have to do with the current state of the petrol industry? What does any classical artist have to do with the current state of the petrol industry? Why go out of one's way to try and ruin something that isn't even remotely related to the subject? They're only making themselves look like a bad joke.

They literally address this: "There is no art on a dead planet." If all humans are dead, art means nothing. Just stop using oil.

Pearl clutching aside, the art was protected by a plexiglass barrier and did no permanent harm.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Evidence suggests that disruptive protests actually help, rather than hinder organisations like JSO:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/07/disruptive-protest-helps-not-hinders-activists-cause-experts-say

https://theconversation.com/climate-change-radical-activists-benefit-social-movements-history-shows-why-181977

https://theconversation.com/radical-environmentalists-are-fighting-climate-change-so-why-are-they-persecuted-107211

It's all about raising awareness and facilitating discussions.

Meanwhile petrol companies are doing everything they can to smother protests: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/26/anti-protest-laws-fossil-fuel-lobby

Consider who gains the most from perpetuating the idea that JSO are the bad guys...

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (5 children)

These people are utter cunts.

All this does is annoy people and potentially damage the actual art. If they threw soup at oil execs or something, at least it’d be somewhat related to their message. But attacking paintings does nothing.

If I saw that in a museum, I’d punch them in the mouth.

We know perfectly well that the art is behind glass and will not be damaged because they did it before. So it's complete nonsense to say that it will potentially destroy the art.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I'm sorry, but these protests are going to far! That was a perfectly fine soup!

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Have we considered that these protests are astroturfing by big professional art-restoration backers?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I keep thinking that these guys have to be right wing plants. Can these people really be this stupid? Doing this shit and blocking roads only makes people your enemy. Go throw paint on billionaire's houses or at your nearest court house you idiots

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm confused who this is for. Even many who agree with them don't appreciate vandalism of art and art galleries.

[–] DeadPand@midwest.social 25 points 5 months ago (20 children)

Will art matter when we’re all dead from climate change tho?? I guess everyone has their priorities

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Will art matter when we’re all dead from climate change tho?? I guess everyone has their priorities

Jesus Christ.

Yes. You got it. Climate crisis averted because some twits threw soup on a priceless painting and damaged the frame. Now we are all aware, whereas we weren't before.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (14 children)

It's to get cameras thrust in their face so they ask when oil executives will face consequences.

"Is destroying art worse than destroying the whole planet???"

It's an idiotic form of protest, it accomplishes nothing but turning the public against you, and forever associating your cause with petty vandalism.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

Except when they did protests targeted at oil infrastructure, that was still apparently wrong and got far less coverage than much safer stunts like these.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments