a9cx34udP4ZZ0

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago

If you just took a shower and your balls are still "dirty" your problem isn't the order in which you dry yourself.

If you can take a shower like a functional adult, it turns out skin is skin and wiping water off your ballsack is fundamentally identical to wiping water off the back of your hand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Did someone prevent you from voting in the primaries? Or running in the primaries if you didn't like the people running?

The candidates don't just magically appear on the ballot. What you're complaining about is "the majority of people didn't want something as progressive as I did so it was duress".

"I'm not getting my way so it's not fair" resonates about as much as "the election was stolen because my guy didn't win". Do you have the right to not vote at all? Sure. But then don't say a fucking thing when the world around you is collapsing becuase the other guy is inifnitely worse than what you were too proud or stubborn to vote for.

Progressives who refuse to vote for a moderate because "compromise is a four letter word" are as bad or worse than the tea party morons who started the republican party down the path of fascism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Owner of proton is a huge MAGA Trumper because he "stands up for the little guys".

https://lemmy.world/post/24301835

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Executive orders can't direclty contradict existing laws. They are utilized in "legal gray areas". If it were that simple, Trump would simply pass an executive order that it's legal for him to assassinate all members of any opposing political party and wipe every non-republican off the face of the earth, literally.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago

It turns out, he can say "not responding to this email is a formal resignation" until he's blue in the face, that doesn't make it so. Ignoring the part where it's not legal. He WILL be paying unemployment to all of them, and likely wrongful termination. Of course by "he" I mean "all of us" because it will be our tax dollars.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

It's like one side was fighting for literally everything, and the other side was a bunch of scared teenagers wondering why the fuck some tropical jungle on the other side of the planet was worth dying for. The only ones actually waking up wanting to fight at all were the psychopaths that just wanted to kill someone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess it's a good thing the question wasn't: what was the first thing Trump went after.

The question was: why aren't corporations pushing back. If you read what I said, instead of apparently assuming I don't understand the order of events of Trumps idiocy, you'd see that I'm telling you that SPORTS has driven folks who would normally be neutral or supporting of transgender rights in the opposite direction. You can say that's stupid, you can say you don't like it, but that's reality. And the INSISTENCE on the trans community of pushing the sports thing gave Trump and company an in to make it the central focus of the discussion.

Why on earth would ANY business get in the middle of that when, again, the majority of Americans do not support it? A topic like this leaves no room for nuance, either a company supports transgender rights and everything that goes with it (like the hotbutton sports topic) or they don't. It is safer for their sales to not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you want an actual answer: the answer is because it's still a pretty controversial topic in the US. If you leave the echo chamber here, you'll find the vast majority of people, even those who support the trans movement, are pretty universally against trans women competing in sports. The fact the movemen tried to force it down everyone's throat and shame anyone who disagreed moved a lot of people from neutral to negative.

When I was growing up, there was no girls wrestling, but "boys" sports in high school aren't "boys" they're "open". We had girls on the wrestling team, girls on the football team. Now as they got older and the boys got bigger and stronger, something like football is a generally a non-starter.

All of that is to say: corporations aren't going to die on this hill when there isn't a clear majority of Americans supporting it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better? No. But why do you think China has been pushing all of the infrastructure projects in Africa, South America, and Eastern Europe? They are ready and waiting for the USD to blow up.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

While I agree the US does a fraction of what they could: Social Security

Medicare

Medicaid

WIC

HUD

ESG

COC

Department of Education

The list goes on and on. If you think there aren't a LOT of social programs that they can cut, you are in for a very, very rough time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, in 2021 they took a $100M investment for a password manager. There's no planet on which they can justify that valuation without doing things to significantly increase their revenue. https://techcrunch.com/2021/07/27/1password-raises-100m-at-a-2b-valuation/

If you've used the product for 10 years like you claim, then you should know very well the many ways in which they've gotten worse. A couple obvious ones off the top of my head because I dropped them like a bad habit after I saw that VC "investment":

  1. they killed off any ability to purchase a permanent license key and forced people into subscriptions.
  2. the app has only improved? How are those nested tags working for you? A feature they had 10 years ago that they broke and never brought back.
  3. Performance on windows has continually gotten worse with every release for the last 8 years.
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s not insane at all. It sucks but it’s completely logical. Musk is just protecting his capital as best he can within a global capitalist system.

No, it's absolutely insane, and short sighted. You know how much his capital will be in the event of WWIII? We won't be spending money on overpriced EVs or sending rockets to outer space on scientific missions to study the universe. Assuming he doesn't get himself assassinated first by people that actually care about democracy. The absolute BEST thing to protect his capital is a strong spending class in the US, which would require the economy to not collapse. You gut social services, there is exactly one logical outcome and it is social unrest followed by either class war or civil war.

view more: next ›