this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44758 readers
5576 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Threatens medics"

This is also known as a "war crime"

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know it’s an old joke but they really are considering it more of a Geneva Checklist, it seems.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

The Geneva Suggestion

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

What the IDF actually said:

In a post on X, the IDF’s Arabic spokesperson threatened that it would target “any vehicle carrying armed men, regardless of its type.”

Using ambulances to transport active combatants is a war crime and the vehicle loses its protection.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The IDF literally masqueraded as medical personnel and assaulted a hospital while still in medical garb. Just saying...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So the Lebanese police too?

Just declaring anyone with a rifle as part of the enemy is a wild way to get yourself in front of the Hague.

But also no. It depends on what the ambulance is doing. Going to the hospital? That's a war crime. Moving armed soldiers to the Frontline, that's a target.

It's not nearly as simple as gun=target. This is the military, not the American police.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don’t think Lebanese police is a combatant in the current war. If police participated in combat operations, they would be combatants.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

So, if you're a police officer and a foreign nation is invading, you should just stand around looking really disappointed?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So it's also a war crime when Israel treat IDF soldiers with your logic

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Treating wounded is never a war crime.

If a combatant is hors de combat, no longer able to fight, then they are no longer a valid military objective.

If the IDF shuttles soldiers ready to fight to the front using an ambulance, it’s a war crime. Shuttling injured soldiers from the front to the back is not a war crime.

Hezbollah and also Palestinian militant groups have been observed to use ambulances to do the former.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's just an IDF accusations. No independent investigation confirmed it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are independent investigations from the 2006 Lebanon war documenting similar cases. You can also find this for previous wars in Gaza and the West Bank.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/14/gaza-unlawful-israeli-hospital-strikes-worsen-health-crisis

An IDF spokesperson said in a televised interview that day: “Our forces saw terrorists using ambulances as a vehicle to move around. They perceived a threat and accordingly we struck that ambulance.” Human Rights Watch did not find evidence that the ambulance was being used for military purposes

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Based on what evidence?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

An injured fighter is no longer a combatant and entitled to medical treatment like any other human being.

But by blowing up the ambulance so that only body parts can be found after, it can always be claimed that the patients were still healthy before being bombed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Specific ambulances are only attacked if there’s intelligence like surveillance that says it’s being used to transport combatants or weapons. If all ambulances were systematically targeted, all ambulances would camouflage as civilian vehicles.

You are correct that persons hors de combat are protected.

Evidence in war zones is always difficult, especially when combatants don’t wear uniforms. You can easily make a combatant look like a civilian, by removing the weapons from the scene. Making civilians look like combatants just takes putting a weapon next to their body. Independent neutral investigators will rarely arrive at a scene before one of the belligerent forces.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Specific ambulances are only attacked if there’s intelligence like surveillance that says it’s being used to transport combatants or weapons

Yeah? You actually believe this?

As the person above you said, there is no way to confirm any of it because they blew it the fuck up. For all we know, it was transporting injured fighters out of the warzone. Blowing that up (and then later lying about it) is something the IDF 1000% would do without thinking twice. It's their M.O.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Ah yeah I guess let’s dig out a Fox News article instead to find out the truth?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Guardian are pretty much the voice of New Labour, who are totally in bed with Israel (they're still sending them weapons and even sent surveillance planes to help them in Gaza).

If The Guardian is actually critical of Israel and the IDF that's a pretty good indication that the Zionist Genocide has already burned most of their good will even in Britain which is one of the most right wing states in Europe and has a history of invariably either being one or supporting White Colonist States in their Genocides of the locals (remember how they supported Appartheid until the last minute and even called Mandela "a terrorist"?!).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/13/israel-orders-more-evacuations-in-lebanon-threatens-medics-who-treat-hezbollah-members
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support