this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
312 points (100.0% liked)

Jobs

329 readers
5 users here now

A community to discuss jobs, whether that's regarding to the search, advice on how to negotiate an offer, or just an open forum to vent.

This is not a place intended for you to post job listings.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

if I'm guaranteed a human interview and not an AI chatbot ...yeah I would pay 20 dls as shitty as it is

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

This is the most entitled white guy take.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

This is not a bad idea but just make it a refundable fee. Maybe larger depending on how badly they want to fill the position. Job shops would have to spend a shit ton of money to spam employers so they could focus on real applicants. If you show up, you get your money back regardless of having or not having an interview.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Simple solution to this problem: just don't apply in that assholes' company.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I paid an application fee to apply for the local electrical union JATC

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Pay $20 to apply for a fake position that was only put up to trick investors into thinking the company is growing. The fee will guarantee you an in-person interview with an unpaid intern instructed to say no all all interviewees (in person, because even if someone gets mad and attacks them - it's just an intern). Parking validation is not included.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Arent the people doing the interview on the clock. Fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

What if we had smart contracts as a type of escrow for this? That way the multitude of bots applying for the jobs have to put something up, and the job poster has to put something up as like a mutual escrow.

I think the problem job posters are having is it’s never been easier to apply to a job. Bots can apply to hundreds of jobs on your behalf in minutes. Now multiply that by the thousands of applicants per job and you’ll start to see the problem. Too many applicants per job. It’s similar problem to spam filtering. There was a thought experiment about requiring emails to cost a real amount of currency to be received or sent which would theoretically reduce spam. Note, I’m not suggesting job applicants use of bots is spam, just illustrating a similarity between the two problem domains.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Companies will find some way to monetize those fees. Those multi-million executive salaries won’t pay themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I'd like to demonstrate my new product, the Neck OsteO-Stretcher Extreme. Guaranteed to provide the discerning millionaire with superior neck alignment and length by exploiting our state of the art GRAVITY DEPLOYMENT™ technology! Now only $9,999, buy yours today!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

pay a fee for an interview, sure. in the old days you'd have to do some real nepotism. what progress.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

1$ to be sure to get an interview? Doesnt even sound that bad? A small fee for a guaranteed interview, rather than hoping 1 in 20 even replies, sounds fine..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But first of all, it's not going to be $1 because it means HR will do more interviews which means the cost has to cover HR to some extent, HR simply isn't that cheap. Secondly, anyone willing to get the job is going to pay that price which means your likelyhood of getting the job probably doesn't change much. And if you're already an in-demand labor then nothing changes for you because you'll be sought out even if you don't apply.

So really what you're paying for is for them to tell you that you're not suited for the position.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And because as you say, it'd never be $1, it's also a way to keep the poorest in society in their place, as if having to pay for travel, and have clean and suitable clothes, and possibly take time away from a current job just to have a superficial initial interview, never mind any subsequent interviews, aren't big enough barriers for those already struggling to feed themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes i mean of course, rarely anything is ever as good as it sounds. Just saying in the literal case of small fee for guaranteed interview Iam in. In the more likely case that you don't really get a chance, e.g. just a 1min call "sorry you don't fit" to tick the box, it's a different matter.

But hey, he said it is supposed to be a thought experiment, no way he would wanna exploit people or anything..:)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›