Based as hell. This is the kind of movement we need. Grassroots organisation to reform the system.
Instead of people throwing away their vote to Russian puppet Jill Stein as a “protest” that doesn’t do anything but help get a full-on facist elected.
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)
Ranked Choice Voting
147 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Ranked Choice Voting Community!
Voting is broken! Let's fix it.
Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is a voting system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. If a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, they are declared the winner. If no candidate wins a majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and votes for that candidate are redistributed to the remaining candidates, based on the next preference on each ballot. This process continues until one candidate has a majority. Learn more about how it works.
Why Ranked Choice Voting?
- Prevents the tyranny of the middle
- Encourages diversity of candidates
- Discourages negative campaigning
- Provides more choice for voters
- Saves money by avoiding runoff elections
Community Rules
- Respect each other's opinions.
- No misinformation. All claims must be backed by credible sources.
- Be proactive and informative.
Sister Communities
- FairVote Canada
- Make one for your country!
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
It’s funny how little interest the people who want Jill Stein are willing to spend on supporting the election reforms that would let her actually get into power.
I talked to a couple of them about it on Lemmy, and invited them to get involved in changing the system to finally make it realistic that they might actually win, instead of just advancing the interests of the candidate most opposite to their chosen candidate.
Would you believe it? They weren’t all that interested. The mind boggles. I thought they loved progress, and the whole idea of getting Trump into power wasn’t at all the whole point. Live and learn I guess.
I’m assuming a decent chunk are state-funded Russian keyboard warriors and the rest of them are heavily influenced by said propaganda.
Please California stand against the powerful few and demand pr be passed without a referendum as 2 choices is not enough.
Honest question off a first impression; if I were going to try to break apart democratic strongholds as a right winger this is how I would approach it from a national perspective. Red states aren't passing this, but if blue states do, wouldn't that basically give right wing more guaranteed representation than they would otherwise have in a winner-tale-all system where the location is strongly blue to begin with?
E.g. if CA does this but TX doesn't, wouldn't that on a national level increase the pull of the right wing? Wrapping it up as "all voices heard" people think of course it means them, but at a chess level, giving up a supermajority in one location(state) seems debatable unless all states do it. Barring widespread adoption in many states, being the "progressive" state and doing this early or first in the process actually opens a window for more power to be given to right wing, no?
It's a good question. They are trying to reform the California state legislature, which wouldn't impact CA's electoral votes or the US legislature. It only impacts the makeup of the state legislature, and allows it to become more equitable.
In practice, I think almost anywhere this was done in state elections, it would benefit Democrats and fringe candidates, since the state congressional districts are often jerrymandered to within an inch of their lives to give Republicans an advantage, and switching to PR would undo that at the state level.
Doing this at the US congress level would be great in my opinion, but it's a massive reform that's not on the table now or within any near future timeframe. They're just talking about California for now, I think.
More about it: https://www.prorepcoalition.org/how-reform-happens
Coming from Oregon, despite a supermajority in state Congress we couldn't pass laws for 3 years during Covid because the Republicans just walked out of sessions. Luckily with the supermajority we passed a law last year that missing too many sessions can get you kicked out and bar you from running again. They may have even had to pass a downward quorum adjustment, can't recall exactly. Search "Oregon Congress walkouts" if you want a primer on what might happen. Point is, the gridlock in Congress that is cynically abused to push through insane fringe perversions so the budget can be funded or our troops be paid or whatever the adults are trying to do, might quickly be the norm by allowing cynical actors bent on "winning at all costs".
CA is passing some pretty decent stuff--if I'm a right winger I'd love some guaranteed standing so I can start to gum up the works
Ugh it’s so frustrating seeing Dunn-Kruger republicans acting like they own the world wasting years of everyone’s time because they couldn’t handled they lost, why should they have so much power in a place they’re politically disadvantaged in because they’re not popular when they go ahead in other states and take away other’s peoples voting rights. They shouldn’t be able to stall everything like that when they’re a small minority.
The laws were written for adults, the posts are not longer inhabited by them and as such there are loopholes to exploit and when you don't want to go to bed at 8pm by God you're going to drag your feet and make the adults suffer. Hence my original question (down voted?) and additional state level concerns (up voted?) as to why the macro and micro matter.