this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Democrats’ calls for unity are futile as Republicans, driven by fascist ideology, seek to suppress differences and maintain power through fear-mongering.

The Republican National Convention showcased this with chants of “fight fight fight” and speeches that vilified perceived enemies.

Trump and his supporters use “unity” as a euphemism for conformity, expecting marginalized groups to suppress their identities.

MAGA’s reliance on “enemies” fuels a cycle of manufactured outrage, and warns that Democrats’ calls for civility may inadvertently enable fascist tactics.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Democrats’ calls for civility may inadvertently enable fascist tactics

inadvertently

[citation needed]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

It was definitely advertently

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Weren't the Democrats the ones calling this election "the only way to save democracy?" Wasn't Donald Trump a fascist who was going to destroy the country and kill people? And now we need to "bring down the temperature?"

Either they were lying before, or they're lying now.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

Who was the party threatening to use the military on their opposition? The democrats don't have faith this will work, their only hope to avoid a night of long knives is to pray they were wrong. I don't think they were though

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are a fool if you can’t see the difference between “vote for our candidate to save democracy” and “we need to use the military against our enemies from within”.

Either you’re arguing in bad faith comrade, or you’re one of the useful idiots that helped Trump get into office.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If Trump is really a threat to democracy the only explanation I have for the Democrat's behavior is that they don't really care that much about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what do you expect the democrats to do? Start a civil war? Surrender and disappear?

I assume they are trying their best to do damage control - and to prevent the destruction of democracy with the tools they have left. Which is not much.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

They could start by not telling people to calm down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I think is strangely it.

As long as you keep a civil tone. Not maga, just you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. We heard this rhetoric for years and it's like "OK and... you're just going to run Biden's animated corpse against him?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And then after the election we need to "bring down the temperature."

Either they're an existential threat to democracy or they're not. If they are Democrats should start acting like it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Liberals are just waiting for a big, strong man to come and save them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Liberals have long fantasized about Jon Stewart running for president (I was one of them once). I've always said that that Trump is the other side of that coin-- a plaintalking TV personality with no real connections in Washington. Stewart is too smart to want the job

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's clear to me that Democrats are just there to collect their donor cash. It's easier to raise money from a defensive position because they can amp up the fearmongering while also never having to fight for a policy their base wants. It's brilliant from a game-theory perspective but it screws all of us pretty hard

I don't have a solution aside from "get money out of politics", which requires more drastic solutions like general strikes or political violence (one may cause the other).

I tell you what-- I sure wish that Crooks guy succeeded in Pennsylvania. Would have cut through some bullshit and introduced uncertainty to a system that needs shaking up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can swap out Dem and Republican in the summary and it still holds true.