this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
253 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23300 readers
2753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (42 children)

“On day one, I will revoke Joe Biden's policies on so-called gender-affirming care. Ridiculous. A process that involves giving kids puberty blockers, mutating their physical appearance, and ultimately performing surgery on minor children. Can you believe this?”

This is the reason he won. Society ain't happy with plastic surgeries performed on children

prohibitions on gender-affirming care for both minors and adults

Only minors, neither article nor my own research point to adult ban. Looks like the article lies on purpose

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

He also proposed excluding hospitals and healthcare providers who offer these services from Medicaid and Medicare

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I don't think it's the reason why Trump won.

Also, most people don't experience trans problems, so the whole thing is a storm in a teacup. Let people have more medical care, not less.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

As predictable as the sun rising in the East. BTW, if you are easy to outrage, you have a bad number of years ahead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

All the innersex conservatives sweating right wondering if they'll also be marginalized

Whoopsy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ah yes, for all the most accurate and insightful news about the US election's consequences I always turn to Pakistani news outlets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s fantastic! Thanks Trump. ❤️

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your account history is too shallow to know if this is sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'm going to guess sarcasm.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›