this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22104 readers
3931 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In December 2012, Dr Meera Sachdeva was sentenced to 20 years in prison and ordered to repay nearly USD 8.2 million for fraud at a former Mississippi cancer centre she ran

Biden commuted the prison sentence of Meera Sachdeva, a cancer doctor who gave diluted chemo drugs to patients as part of an $8 million Medicare fraud.

Also re-used old needles, leading to a lawsuit by a patient who claimed he contracted HIV.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

What in the fuck!? How about closing Gitmo before freeing these degenerate white collor murderers?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You mean like Obama did? And then how he got blocked immediately?

Yeah, why didn’t we do the thing that was already done and hope for a different outcome!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ah, yes, the "helpless executive" bullshit excuse for cowardice. Obama did not need to throw it to Congress by trying to relocate detainees to the US, they shouldn't be detained in the first place and the gov has nothing on them except Bush administration gibberish that they know can't hold up in a court of law. As commander-in-chief both he and Biden always had the power to order them released and repatriated and order their State Department to work on their repatriation with their nations of origin. That does not require any input whatsoever from Congress and not even the judiciary could stop it, it falls under broad commander-in-chief authority.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I take it you read all the prisoners' files and studied each case for hours then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It doesn't matter. Trump released thousands of terrorists. It literally doesn't matter anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I've been through all the classified intel that even the detainees were not allowed to know which definitely 100% proves they're guilty and don't need a fair trial. Next time I meet with Ould Slahi I'll ask him how come he never simply requested the classified intel about him be made public so that people like you would stop making excuses for his kidnapping and torture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

people like you would stop making excuses for his kidnapping and torture.

What a douche bag-- shoving tons of words in my mouth. I don't actually know a fucking thing about your opinion except you think all the prisoners are innocent and give zero fucks if you're wrong. Looks like that's all I'll ever know 👋

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they are innocent until proven guilty in a proper court adhering to basic standards of law, and the "consequences" of releasing geriatrics kidnapped and locked in a torture camp on the other side of the world for the past couple of decades are hypothetical gibberish that has been considered and duly disregarded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Raging against an actual hypothetical viewpoint, is kind of useless. You know nothing about my opinion and you won't know anything

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

To be clear, as happened with a bunch of these. They were not individual pardons. They were a batch of 1500 offenders who had non violent crimes, and were already outside of prisons on home release from covid situations. He didn't pick and choose, it was just everyone who was in that situation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Why are you trying to soften the obvious blow here?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah, maybe he fucking should have though.