this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
188 points (97.5% liked)

World News

45590 readers
3565 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People in here seem to question why it's not the North, being responsible for the vast majority of emissions.

Rich countries have factories and cars, but also a technological standard and environmental regulations. Both limit the amount of air pollution (think dust particles) while greenhouse gases (like CO~2~) are something else.

Now think of a poor country with low regulations and old technology. People in slums burn literal dirt in their ovens. While they contribute almost nothing to climate change, air quality reflects the quality of fuels, ovens, engines and regulations. It's poor.

This is just a general take. I opened the article, but immediately closed it due to popups and eyesore.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

You see it with everything from food quality, cigarettes, fuel. The standards set in the West prevent so much random shit we never acknowledge.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

epicenter

I do not think it means what you think it means.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Epicentre - (formal) the central point of something

edit: spelling

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The epicenter is not the center; it's a point above the center. It's from seismology. An earthquake's origin is beneath the earth's surface. The epicenter is the point on the surface that's directly above the origin point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, it is used like that. However, not just in english, but in many languages, epicentre is sometimes used with the meaning of "centre of something".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still don't understand why not USA / Canada, where cars are very common

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Non-CO2 pollutants are side products of combustion. A cleaner combustion reduces their amount. Cleaner combustion occurs in healthy, well engineered engines with the help of clean catalytic converters. It means that new and expansive cars are less pollutant.

That's why. Usa and Canada have better cars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you continue to burn coal to help lift people from poverty. There has to be a better way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There is, but coal is cheap, when you only look at what it costs before you set it on fire.