Fizz

Wefwef such a good name

Yeah every single test in marks video

Improvements to the low latency streaming mode is always welcome.

IDC I'm still going to sabotage it.

That looks insane. The features are so unique. Video to in game dance? Camera mimicking your facial impression. Thats going to be wild if the multiplayer gets made.

The ai object feature looks good if it works.

Thats a good feature but it kind of reads like ai slop and allows windows to blame the users hardware for issues.

If a man does anything that's not approved by the strict regulation of the council of his male friends then they are gay. Its simple, there is no need to over complicate it by introducing sex.

Id ask him.

Republicans want trans people banned from playing in sports, this includes school sports. It was a major focus for their election marketing. Republicans used the example of Trans people playing in sports at the highest level. In these debates left winger pundits failed to present convincing arguments compared to the right wing pundits because the focus was on top 0.00001% of athletes where biological differences could be seen as unfair.

Because of this, the majority of Americans (66% of adults) now believe trans people should not play in gendered sports.

I am suggesting that instead of running from the discussion, we can respond and present a convincing argument on why trans people SHOULD be allowed to play in gendered sports.

My suggestion for a more convincing argument is that we focus on school sports because they precisely "kids having fun" and no reasonable person would fight to remove a 12 year old from playing with her friends on the netball team. Except this is exactly what is happening in some places and at threat of happening nationwide.

because this is not going to be a light read for a self-proclaimed intelligent centrist. What a strange opener? I've never claimed this. I have a feeling this entire comment is going to be attacking positions I did not mention and views I do not hold.

"The left is getting killed on the trans sports issue" Do you have any data backing this? And what analysis goes with the data?

Yes, source - pew research 66% of adults are against trans people in sports. This and other anti trans sentiment are up from 2017. Now the analysis that goes with that is i've watched a ton of online debate (which influences the opinions of all who view it) from the largest politcal and non politcal content creators for the past decade and there is a clear weaponization of trans issues. The reason these issues are being weaponized is because the right know that they can "win" debates on these issues. The arugments they use are not at all convincing in my opinion but they seem to sway the average person.

you could have said that the majority of German did not think Jews should be married to Germans. So what? So much for the argument that we should sacrifice human rights of ANY group because they are unpopular.

No you do not understand. I'll play on the example. If I had said that majority of Germans did not think Jews should marry Germans. I would be aruging that we need to convince majority of Germans that it is ok for Jews to marry germans by finding a argument that is strong.

By extension, what you suggest is morally corrupt and inhumane, and it is deeply fascist in its very conception.

What do you think im suggesting? I really do not think you at all understand what im suggesting. You're a .ml user so maybe you think that trying to present a convincing argument in favor of trans rights is morally corrupt.

You people hand-wave a fucking lot when you suggest that trans rights are so unpopular that they have lost you elections, when there have been multiple arguments that Democrats barely touched on the topic, apart from being loosely against killing trans people in pogroms and LUKEWARM at that. So your argument amounts to little more than “Fascist discourse is more trendy so let’s do that instead”, which is not JUST the Ratchet effect: it is “being complicit to actual genocide”.

Who is "you people"? I did not suggest that trans rights were so unpopular that they caused democrats to lose the election. I suggested that they were an issue that the right used to attack the left with great success (I know it was successful because they managed to shift public opinion significantly in a 4 year period). Even you claim that Democrats barely touched the topic, why do you think that was?

So your argument amounts to little more than “Fascist discourse is more trendy so let’s do that instead”, which is not JUST the Ratchet effect: it is “being complicit to actual genocide”.

No this is not my argument. Its not even remotely close.

I've responded to enough of this comment. It makes no sense, it might be AI slop and the people who upvoted it should be ashamed.

Ok I understand now, thanks

I don't think it was very good response. All the points he brings up do not change any of the outcomes. Fsr would likely still fail all these tests.

Ive watched a lot of AI driver and I think fsr is cool but its lack of lidar is a huge mistake and creates these dangerous situations whete Tesla isn't smart enough to mimic the awareness of a real driver.