this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
437 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69600 readers
3123 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

valued at $157 billion

Isn't profitable

Pick one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Profitable means your revenue is higher than your expenses. Valuation is whatever someone is willing to buy your business for (i.e. what they think the company could earn in the future). They are completely separate concepts, and a highly profitable company could have a low valuation while an unprofitable company can have a high valuation based purely on the future potential of the company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is a private company that can say it's worth whatever they want it doesn't make it true. Only public companies have to have the bare minimum of transparency

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think you misunderstand what valued at means.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

People always act like "how can company A be a thing when it isn't profitable". It isn't about if company A is profitable. It's about whether CEO A is making money. As long as that can happen and, you know, others at the top, company A is right on track.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yes and it should be worse. OpenAI should be forced to take on the cost of compensating every copyright holder it exploited. If that means OpenAI doesn’t exist I’m absolutely okay with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

removing the cost of R&D I would assume its profitable right? Once the model is trained running it takes significantly less computing. OpenAI has a fuck ton of customers so I would assume they are making back the cost of running their model API.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

With these kinds of models you can't ever stop training them, otherwise you reach a point where the data becomes dated and thus the model is dated.

Think world events. Say another bird flu became a pandemic. The model can only know about that if it's trained on those events.

There are systems (Rag) that can answer questions based on additional content, but that would only work on a subset of problems/situations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oh true i did not consider that they require constant training to stay up to date.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Isn't it a private company? They could say it's worth infinity trillion dollars...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Chat GPT= Email Grammar Check.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›