this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45416 readers
4200 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We need to ban advertising for all addictive substances/activities. We've mostly come to terms with the fact that mixing addiction and marketing are horrible for public health when it comes to cigarettes. We need to extend that to gambling, alcohol, Marijuana, hell even sugary drinks.

Even ignoring the public health implications, it's just cruel to recovering addicts. It must suck to see advertisements of attractive people having fun drinking beer if you're a recovering alcoholic and are just trying to forget about it.

I'm opposed to prohibition as it just ends up jailing minorities and empowering the police, but just because we make something legal to consume doesn't mean we have to give it over to the market and capitalism with its perverse incentives for growth at all costs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It sucks and this predatory behaviour should be regulated out of existence and the people behind it Luigi'd.

However, it's not very easy to have sympathy for the guy. Any time you can just walk away.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

“Bro just stop being addicted” wow thanks, im cured…

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So can alcoholics. So can drug users. So can obese people. So can people in abusive relationships.

Walking away is rarely as simple as it sounds, and it's typically better to have empathy and offer support rather than dismiss them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You clearly don't know how addiction works if you think they can just walk away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've had multiple physical substance addictions, some multiple at a time and ultimately I just stopped when I needed to. It's hard, but it's definitely not impossible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

You didn't really understand what you read.

Over two years, when his gambling problem was at its height, the Sky Bet group emailed him multiple times a day, with staggering success. Internal records suggest that of the 1,389 emails it sent him offering free spins and bonus prizes, Sam engaged with 98% of them. “I wasn’t able to ignore them. They had this grip on me,” he said.

They reached out to him. Specifically. Personally. Not automated. They decided on him.

Did your drug dealers text you multiple times a day? For two years?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't think your experience is universal. Others struggle a lot more with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

But that's the thing. I struggled too, so did I have it easier, or try harder? I humbly assume the former most of the time, but the sheer scale in question in this article plus the logistics of actually having to gamble that much make me wonder.