this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2762 readers
590 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...

...or whatever. Fuck it, it's probably some really obscure subsection way down in the legal code.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

“Thou shalt not kill… *unless it is a passive byproduct of fully preventable food insecurity”

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It'll probably get to stay this time

¯\(ツ)

[–] Garibaldee@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you post the Ten Commandments in a classroom, students will read the rule against committing adultery, and Sen. Cora Neumann had a question about that situation.

The Montana Legislature already has told schools to notify parents about anything related to sex — even teaching Romeo and Juliet — so parents can have their children “opt out” of the lesson in question.

Given that consideration, Neumann wondered how teachers would handle the situation with the Ten Commandments — from a practical standpoint.

“This is actually going against our own Legislature’s ruling of the last session of exposing children to explicit sexual references,” said Neumann, D-Bozeman.

I would love to see a court square the circle on how bringing up adultery has nothing to do with sex.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Abrahamic hypocrisy on being simultaneously obsessed with and disgusted by sex.