Proton lol. Also the only privacy is achieved with OpenPGP but no one uses it.
Privacy
Protect your privacy in the digital world
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
- No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
- Stay on topic.
- Don't promote big-tech software.
- No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
- No crypto, blockchain, etc.
- No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
Related communities:
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Nobody uses PGP because it's annoying, the tooling is not user friendly, it requires a lot of manual efforr for multi-device access and most people simply don't have the ability to manage keys safely. And that is why offloading all this effort to Proton (or similar providers like tuta) who does all the PGP stuff transparently is the only viable solution.
It’s hard to make the full switch towards a more private life, but switching your mail already fixes a big underlying issue: that being, Google or other companies having access to all your emails. So, I’ll cover the basics of making your online mailing more private.
The issue is that the moment you send a mail to someone or receive an email from someone that is using Gmail (or whatever provider that don't care about privacy), your own email is not private anymore: it's read by that other company. So, unless everyone was to start using encrypted emails and I should say compatible encrypted emails, real email privacy will be little more than a wish.
It's a good move to ditch companies like Google, obviously, but one should not let potential switcher believe that it's a magical wand that will make their emails private. It is not.
As a side note, I would also suggest for a much better privacy: use emails aliases so you never share your real email with any company or service provider.
i have some very bad news about proton
I'll check and correct my post when I get home
Thanks!
While the original comment has validity, I think it's important to know that a lot of the proton news you'll find is very "drop it immediately" biased.
I definitely think the news left a bad taste that's worth keeping an eye on, but I don't think it should eliminate them completely as an option. Especially for newer privacy advocates.
Edit: full disclosure for future readers, I may be biased as well since I do continue to use proton services and I love it. But I still try to look at both sides on things like this.
Just researched into it, and while I dislike the situation, is not something I see bad enough to delete proton from this post
I'm quite happy with proton and while I don't think they are the silver bullet of privacy, they're still about the best "private suite" of apps you can get with little to no effort
I think you're spot on. I find it vexing when people point to what happened with ProtonMail as proof that their entire software stack is compromised, when what happened is simply a limitation of email clients in general (and maybe always will be) and laws that every business is subject to. How email works is not how VPNs work.
I think it was a wakeup call for a lot of people, though, that thought they could just use their email to remain anonymous.
What I was referencing was the political news recently with their CEO. Lotta people up in arms about that one. However I haven't heard of the email one. Was that the one where the Users IP got leaked/turned over?
Any links you can share?