this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
288 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45678 readers
4161 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 71 points 1 month ago

This is a terrorist attack, plain and simple. They are testing the waters after the talk with Trump.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm thinking if Russia ends up releasing a bunch of radiation from Chernobyl and it spreads across Europe like last time (which it probably will), that will be what draws Europe into the war.

On the other hand, Vlad better be careful which way the wind is blowing.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, and you'd think it was on purpose, there's not a lot else in the area that could be a plausible target.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure it was on purpose. I'm guessing they knew the drone would not be strong enough to actually get through the shield. It was a threat.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

And just about as potent as his constant jabber about "I'll fire the nukes aaany second now".

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 37 points 1 month ago

Dec 2024

A Russian missile attack has killed at least eight people and injured another 22 - including a child - in Ukraine's southern city of Zaporizhzhia, local officials say.

In a separate development on Tuesday, Ukraine and Russia accused each other of launching a drone attack on a convoy of vehicles transporting experts from the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The agency said one of its cars was "severely damaged" as the convoy was heading to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP). No injuries were reported.

IAEA head Rafael Grossi condemned the attack on his staff as "unacceptable", stressing that the agency was "working to prevent a nuclear accident during the military conflict".

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8g9pzn8z0o

I wonder who it was? 🤔 Who is the one attacking international civilian infrastructure like intetnet cables and children's hospitals?

The panty poisoner strikes again...

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

This really smells like something that directly stems from Trump Putin talks. Trump is basically going to come up with a shitty deal for Ukraine, and then try to strong-arm Europe and Ukraine into going along with it. This is just a way of saying " hey Europe, this can affect you too! You should totally pressure Ukraine into taking this shitty deal... cuz you wouldn't want something bad to happen, right? (Hint hint)"

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Some questions came up in my mind as soon as I saw this in the news this morning:

  • How would Russia benefit from attacking Chernobyl?
  • What is the evidence that it was Russia who did this?
[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I believe the benefit is making the situation more dangerous and unpredictable, which increases the gravity of the concessions Europeans are willing to make just have it all stop.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I can kind of believe that, except I still think it makes more sense for the losing party to do this as a signal that they will go scorched earth if they lose.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would Russia benefit from attacking Chernobyl?

Russia has consistently applied wanton violence as a tool in this war. This is a threat to Ukraine: take a bad deal or things can get worse for you.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even if we stipulate that "Russia has consistently applied wanton violence as a tool in this war", it doesn't follow that they would also do something that would be very risky to themselves when they are about to get everything they want. If makes more sense that the losing party would get desperate and want to send a signal that they would go scorched earth if they lose.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Who had "Chernobyl radioactivity flaring up across Europe" on their 2025 bingo?

[–] QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How the fuck is only 199 upvotes.