this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant, move to [email protected]] Shows and TV

1502 readers
3 users here now

Please move to [email protected]

Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television

  1. Be nice
  2. Don't go off topic
  3. Don't rage farm

Other communities

We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Excellent series, just finished season 1.

Great pacing and acting. Got into the social politics on the field, and added in some cartel spice.

Toward the end of season 1 there was a bunch of unnecessary relationship drama, but still great overall.

Billy Bob Thornton really sells this series.

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just be aware that the creator is a climate change denialist and puts his personal opinions into the show.

Climate Town had an informative episode about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Having watched the show, they didn't deny climate change in season 1. They talked about the lack of better options when comparing total carbon cost for the various alternatives.

Not to mention the scene where they use a windfarm to power the pumpjacks in a rural area.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I overall enjoyed the story and the acting, but nearly every episode had some formulaic monologue where Thornton or Hamm explained some anti-climate change BS to a character that was portrayed as incompetent for believing in it. It's the same formula used in all these types of shows where some Tough Man™ is always correct in every situation and any character who happens to believe in science or data, is a woman or PoC is treated like a bumbling fool. Reacher is another good example of this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

"lack of better options" IS propaganda my friend. They're saying there is some line in the sand where they will acknowledge that green energy is better, without ever saying it.

It's a common excuse, that green energy isn't perfect it must be bad. It doesn't matter that it removes 80% of the emissions, it's 100% or nothing, that's the standard they set. No options will ever be perfect, so they can keep people thinking that it's moral to keep using oil. It's not.

Not to mention that the "facts" they tout in the series are just plain wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Great point

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If you want to see life in the field itself, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBW0qA5hPmdEGMXky8TX9ww TheZachLife runs his own tiny fields, repairs everything, and walks through the science, business, and mechanics of keeping a bunch of low yield oil leases going.

I think having been watching ZachLife for a few years, I really appreciated landman the series, since I had a on the ground background.