this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
450 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22161 readers
3375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 88 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So, when Social Security gets gutted, we’re all getting the money we put in back, right? …right?!

[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, of course! As long as you make at least $100M a year, all investments will be returned as tax breaks.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Billionaires: anything less than one hundred million is basically the same as zero to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I want it back + interest.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Every American should file for a refund of all the SS taxes they paid when they do their income taxes next year. With the gutting of the IRS on top of SS, they’ll probably accept those claims without question and accept those refunds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The American Prospect, which first reported earlier this week that Acting SSA Commissioner Leland Dudek was weighing staff cuts of up to 50%

Congratulations protest non voters, this is what you voted for.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

100% agree, and they need to never be allowed to forget this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

And blaming the voters still isn't the energy you want.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

So you assume to know what others want? Because I’m right there with them. Non protest/non-voters absolutely helped to put us here. There is nothing at all wrong with pointing this out.

And as John Lydon would say: Anger is an energy.

And I believe that anger’s best use now is ensuring that the fucking assholes that did this are called out and learn from it so that if god-forbid we happen to find ourselves here again, they’ll acutely get off their assed and fucking help.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

All you're doing is ensuring people ignore the Democrats. They hate politics. They don't trust you or the parties. Yelling at them just confirms it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And all you’re doing is expecting people to kiss your collective asses while you all sit around and smugly talk down to everyone while making bullshit proclamations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

That's laughable. After decades of politicians measurably ignoring their constituents and making laws their corporate donors ask for, you accuse people of being egotistical. That's straight up bullshit dude.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"oh the people who won't do anything will keep doing nothing"

Oh shit whatever will I do with their feelings being hurt. Poor little fee fees. Fuck the people that sat out or protest voted or were dumb enough to pretend Trump actually would help bring peace anywhere much less to Palestine.

What are they going to do, be upset that they have to hear the truth?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It is a pretty amusing overlap in the people that will screech about victim blaming but can't seem to wrap their head around the concept that the people ultimately responsible for a crime are only the people doing it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bullshit. Those who allowed it to happen are also culpable. Fuck you, protest voters. You could have stopped this by voting for Harris and you chose not to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

The Peter Parker principle.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How is this blame? This is what the voters wanted. This is what they are getting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's blaming the people who didn't vote. Which is a bullshit theory the conservative Democrats have been pushing to keep from dealing with why they lost.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Which is a bullshit theory the conservative Democrats have been pushing to keep from dealing with why they lost.

No. That is the bullshit excuse that performative faux-leftsts use. The impact of non-voters and anti-electoralists is plain to see for anyone with the slightest comprehension of statistical math that is so basic that is barely qualified as anything above arithmetic.

Every election in my lifetime has resulted in worsening of the human condition because "protest (non-)voters" can't be bothered to consider the most elementary examples of cause and effect:

Don't voice your view in an established manner and your view will not be reflected.

There's no political representation of us on the left because too many can't be fucked to participate in primaries or the democratic process (as much as it can be called that) either because they buy into the idea that, despite all evidence contrary, not opposing oppressors will somehow make things better or, because, again despite all evidence contrary, offering up minorities, LGBTQ+, and other vulnerable groups as blood sacrifice by enabling the establishment of fascism will somehow magically result in a workers' revolution and utopia.

TL;DR - Non-voters/protest voters and acceleration can get fucked. The are no allies to LGBTQ+ nor the working class as they are unwilling to do the literal least one can do to try to impact positive change, apparently preferring fascists and corpo dems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There just isn't a large leftist movement in the US. They aren't going to win more than a few seats. And blaming them while running further to the right is exactly what's happened every election in my lifetime. People have to exert effort to vote in most places, they need to get time off, they need to stand in line for hours, they need to deal with partisan poll workers, and for what? To watch the Democrats do corporate welfare too?

And don't start with the whole they were warned bit either. Every single cycle the Democrats have said the Republicans would end democracy. So nobody was listening to that anymore. The word fascist has entirely lost it's meaning in the US.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll point you back to the article. And to my comment: Congratulations protest non voters, this is what you voted for.

Literally what protest non voters voted for.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Sigh. They didn't vote. That's quite literally not a vote. No matter how hard you want to blame them for something they didn't do.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sigh. They made a choice that amounted to voting for this. An intentional and deliberate choice. Thus, this is what they voted for. Congratulations!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Oh? Aren't you guys always yelling about voter suppression? So which is it? Everyone who didn't vote made a conscious decision or at least some people were prevented from voting?

As for the rest. Yes apathy is a choice. After decades of watching both parties do nothing about their slow slide into homelessness I cannot act surprised that people are more worried about making rent than voting.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Choosing inaction is a choice and one that only ever helps the oppressors.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

that is literally a vote, as the saying goes, standing by not to doing anything is bad as helping the enemy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

alot of MAGA are stupid enough to believe hes just joking on what hes going to do, besides the bigotry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My nice but moronic neighbor is one of those "but he just talks a lot of shit, he won't do that" types. Surprise: he does talk a lot of shit and he's increasingly doing that shit too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Musk has been spouting how Social Security is a scam and how tariffs will make up for it. Basically, kiss your social security pension away and just hope a substitute pops up - although it will likely be in the form of "get a check if you don't criticize us" now. DOGE is an excuse to Big Data everything from every department and process it through AI, including knowing your political association.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

Hilarious.

“Social security is a scam” = “I’m taking your retirement money for myself”

“Tariffs will make up for it” = “As a bonus fuck you, 20% tax on everything you need to survive”

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

and just hope a substitute pops up

I have equal confidence in a trump designed Social Security replacement as the healthcare replacement trump came up with to replace Obamacare (ACA).

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I work with two people that are within a year of retiring and they are absolutely ecstatic that Trump was doing this to Social Security, as well I work with people that are in their early 20s that are exactly the same happy that this is happening and thinking that they will all become super wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My redneck trailer cock American family has absolutely nothing saved for retirement, but they think that social security tax took all of their money and gave it to people who are cheating the system pretending to be disabled

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

I hear the same bs too. I work with a few hardcore Mormons who say the same thing, its bizarre.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

did you ask them if they were making 400k+ year? because thats the only group above 400k that will benefit from all these tax cuts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No I didn’t bring that up, I actually barely talk to anybody I work with anymore. I just listen and laugh to myself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

this is the way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Employer and employee both have to pay 6.2%, wanna bet they eliminate the employers portion?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wanna bet my salary doesn't go up 6.2% when they do that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

An excuse for them to lower it by 7%

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

like alot of sketchy companies, employers will just eliminate some of thier employees even more to give them selves more money, and just squeeze out the skeleton crew for alot tech, biotech, and health

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A 99.7% accuracy rate gutted for profit? Efficiency isn't the goal; it's exploitation.

🐱

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Buy the ticket, take the ride

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aaah first I really thought, well, there it is, they began the killing. I'm glad that's not what happened

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›