this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
204 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45629 readers
2484 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wow. Definitely not a Russian asset

What could he do differently to prove he isn't one? Cause there's no daylight between his actions and Putin's desires

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago

As a wise man once said: The card says ~~Moops~~ Krasnov.

TL;DR: Maybe he is, maybe he isn't, and either way it doesn't matter because he sure as hell acts like a Russian asset.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How does deporting people back to Ukraine help Russia? Wouldn't that just increase their potential to resist?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not really. These are refugees. Women, children, and disabled people primarily I'd imagine. What's actually going to happen is that after arrival in Ukraine, they'll be moved to Poland/Romania/etc to keep them out of the line of fire again.

The only thing this does is disrupt their lives again for no reason.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

The only thing this does is disrupt their lives again for no reason.

Conservatism: the cruelty is the point.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As we all know, women are incapable of fighting. When we fire a gun the recoil breaks all our bones!

You're right, though, this is really unfair to the refugees. I'm just saying, Russia doesn't really get anything out of this.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As we all know, women are incapable of fighting. When we fire a gun the recoil breaks all our bones!

I know, military service is the final boss of sexism, but that's still how it is in Ukraine. There's some murmuring they may be expanding their conscription to women of fighting age without children, but it is still the case that women are exempt from mandatory military service.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still, women are able to work and contribute to the war ecobomy. Or do they not let women run industrial machines or drive trucks or staff hospitals in Ukraine either?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh, they absolutely do. As far as I'm aware though, the people Ukraine got out ASAP to any country that would have them were women whose husbands were conscripted and were the caretakers for multiple children.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Children definitely won't help Ukraine resist, that's a good point. Women with children can still work, though. Many do, in fact!

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if unwilling/unable to participate in defense, they are logistically an addition to the civilian population who are directly in harms way and must be defended, housed, fed, etc. this is just one possible issue - I am sure there are others.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Ukraine doesn't seem to give a shit if people are willing, they get forced to fight anyway.

Also, civilians are still useful in war time. Ukraine still has an economy, despite the war. They're needed to run industrial production, logistical support, distribution, transportation, etc.

Many are children, though, and that definitely doesn't help Ukraine.

Wow, so that’s an unambiguously evil play. Not surprising, but still.

[–] saltynachos@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

The cruelty is the point.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

What a cunt!

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Come to Canada. There's already a rich Ukrainian community. We'd love to have you.

[–] itstoowet@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

And let me guess, the Russians who fled to America to claim asylum will have their cases expedited and approved.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Is it time to start modifying houses with hidden basements and attics? It feels like that point in time.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will he make them wear armbands too?

QR code tattoos...

Jesus, now I just make myself sad at the prospect.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did, my bad! I swear I've been on the Internet before!

[–] JanoRis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

let me guess he's gonna deport them to russia isn't he

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago