this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1532 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69702 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I really hope some team has been following the changes in Chrome/Chromium by Google to remove Manifest v2, and has been keeping a patchset that will undo the damage? Time to make a hard fork and get some funding to try to keep it going?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i expect at least the 'big' 'non megacorp' chromium based ones like vivaldi, opera, brave to keep mv2 as long as it is possible.

but i can totally see google doing some serious mangling of the codebase to make patching-in mv2 difficult.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's the futile hope I suppose that antitrust cases going on against Alphabet might force Google to divest Chrome from its advertising arm, so that there's no pressure to make this whole thing worse. Hah, in my dreams.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I'm very happy with it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Didn't consider chrome before and still wont

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh

Doesn't cover 100% of what uBO did, but it still works just as good IMO with DNS based ad-blocking on top.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Yeah, I heard someone say a week or so ago that they straight disabled it in the browser, and now only the gimped version that works with Manifest V3 works now. Thankfully I switched to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff was announced. As far as I know it's the only browser out there that isn't based on Chromium (which Google also controls, so browsers like Brave will likely be affected by this soon as well, unless a bunch of those smaller browsers get together and fork Chromium and maintain it themselves, which I'm not very hopeful about) and so doesn't have to worry about these shenanigans.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (26 children)

Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

The big assumption here is that the website had time or money invested in it. I feel like the vast majority of websites these days are just ai garbage with enough ads to prevent you from even reading the thing and give your computer herpies as a bonus. The era of good faith advertising where the ads were reasonable and balanced with the quality of content is long gone. Most sites are now explicitly designed for exploitive data harvesting and endless ad delivery.

Of course, some websites are exceptions to this and adblock can easily be toggled off for those websites if you really want to support them. Taking off protections for a trusted partner though is quite different from raw dogging the whole internet

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Look, the boot tastes perfectly fine. Besides, how will the millionaires eat if I don't spend my attention to get them paid? What's another ad. And another ad. Ads when I drive, ads when I park. Ads when I'm reading the news and ads when I'm watching TV. Anyone else hungry for lol.

Not everything I view online deserves money. I decide what is worth it to give money to and I decide what news articles I'm allowed to read.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your annoyance does not pay the bills though. You are annoying yourself for nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's really annoying to me that Firefox doesn't seem to work well on my chromebook, so I'm stuck with Chrome until I need a new computer...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not surprising, Google is an ad company at this point.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

It never was anything else

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›