Xanza

I'm not a legislative body, so I can't pardon anyone.

Female students have a right to a safe space free from genetic males--trans females. Prioritizing trans females ignores current female athletes' concerns. Which is the core issue.

You can't negate students' rights for inclusivity. Gendered leagues are, by definition, gendered. Schools can't legally curtail student rights to accommodate others, regardless of feelings about transgenderism. Some athletes oppose competing with trans individuals, and their rights have to also be respected.

This is a desegregation moment. Like the South's defense of segregated schools, gender-separated sports are being used to exclude. The Civil Rights movement shifted focus to Black students' right to public education. You have to shift the focus from a never-ending fight about rights to desegregate collegiate sports. Mixing gender-separated sports with transgenderism is untenable. Eliminate gendered sports; a level playing field removes grounds for opposition. It's the only sensible solution.

My brother, born a woman, transitioned. The only one that has called him a woman has been you and if you were standing in front of me I would have already made your face completely flat for it. You have this so incredibly backwards it's actually fucked up to watch. You don't know me. You only know what you've convinced yourself that you know about me which is absolutely nothing.

The one who shows they don't know what human rights are, is you. Human rights are not universal. They change from country to country. Countries literally sit down and vote on what they believe is and is not a human right.

Almost everything that you've said in any of your replies start to finish has been fucked up, a misunderstanding on your behalf, or a complete and total fabrication.

People have a constitutional right to the freedom of expression. If a bigot wants to protest black people in a public place they have every right to do that. That's not me defending their actions that's me literally pointing out that they have the right to do that and you do not have the right to take that right away from them simply because you have disagree with it. I'm so sick and tired of watching little children like yourself run around and act like they're such forward-thinkers and they're so pro-rights while simultaneously not acknowledging that even people you disagree with have rights.

You're not half as good a person as you think you are, you're absolutely not as open-minded as you believe yourself to be and you're probably less than a third as smart as you think you are.

I'm a constitution loving leftist. I've never voted red. My brother is trans, and trans rights is particularly important to me.

But again, whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night because it's simply unconscionable to you that someone can advocate for someone's rights that doesn't show up on your "acceptable groups of people" list. It always blows my mind away that people who pretend to be so enlightened think nothing of denying the rights of others when the marginalized groups they pretend to represent know all too well what that feels like.

Other people don't stop having rights simply because you do, and vice versa. All rights must be protected, even the ones you find repugnant, or we all lose rights. It's the foundational cornerstone of our democracy, the constitution, and history.

But I guess we'll just gloss over that because I said "other people also have rights" and you interpret that to be transphobic...somehow.

Does anyone have any helpful guides on setting up jellyfin with a certificate so they can privately host it while also keeping it secure and up to date?

You can expose jellyfin via a reverse_proxy like caddy2, godoxy, ssl-proxy, or you can use something like lego to directly manage your certificates without the proxy. Lego is great because it works with dozens of dns providers, even cloudflare.

How is this a win...?

and I fucking hate it.

I worked in the oilfield for over 10 years, and feel like I can lend a little incite into this that goes slightly beyond layman; they want public lands.

Oil companies pay pennies on the dollar for public lands, and they profit-share significantly less with the federal government than with a private land-lease. They make significantly more over the life of a producing well on public lands (land owned by you and me), which is why they were pissed when Biden said "no more public lands!" during his Presidency which is a direct result of oil companies not willing to negotiate for fair value for these leases despite the profit they make.

They want to be able to extract oil and natural gas (and possibly lithium in the future, soon as they figure out a cost effective way to remove it from produced fluid) that's owned by you, and me, for as cheap as possible and sell it back to you and to me for a massive profit.

This entire "energy emergency" is a way to skirt around existing laws against leasing public lands to oil companies without having to spend time in court or expending political capital to repeal them.

Not really. Or at all. Both of those are multi-purpose devices which you can use for other things. A plex license is singularly for Plex. It doesn't do anything more for you than to stream your own media, something you can already accomplish for free.

Of all the examples you could have chosen you essentially picked the worst two.

I really feel like this is more of a middle finger to the US than anything, but I'll take it.

So you don't like Google. And you expect other's not to like Google (I don't, by the way) or you think they're idiots. But when someone asks you why, you're not willing to defend your position there and you just want to call people who don't immediately side with your position on Google idiots...

Are you a real person, or just AI? You can't honestly be a real person, can you?

The paradox of tolerance is tolerating intolerance can lead to the erosion of tolerance itself. I'm perfectly cognizant of what you're trying to say, and what your meaning is and I can tell by your replies that you've not only not read what I've said (or don't understand it), but you're entirely misrepresenting what I have said.

You're under the entirely mistaken impression that I'm being tolerant of those who are being intolerant because I'm not calling for their heads on pikes. Being anti-trans is intolerant and I believe that pushing back against them is worth doing and necessary for a society. But acknowledging that, according to the US constitution, these intolerant people have the right to be intolerant in the same way that trans people have the right to be trans, isn't being tolerant of the intolerant. It's pointing out that our most supreme law of the land affords these people this right and attempting to curtail that right is in violation of those rights and is unconstitutional in the same way its unconstitutional to attempt to curtail the rights of trans.

I've said exactly two things in the entirety of all my replies here;

1. All people have rights, not just trans students, which must all be respected whether you think their opinion is repugnant or not
2. Universities shouldn't have the right to set the social zeitgeist for students, that needs to be left up to the students themselves and if that means the students agree that trans athletes shouldn't compete then that needs to be respected too

Personally I would hope that wouldn't be the case. I would think that the younger generation have a good head on their shoulders and would see that trans rights are human rights. But you can't force that ideology onto people. Recognizing people have a right to be intolerant isn't siding with them, nor is it feeding into a tolerance paradox. I can still call them assholes and bigots while simultaneously recognizing their right to be repugnant.

Agreed. It encourages that behavior.